Comparative study of laparoscopic versus abdominal sacral colpopexy in women with Grade III or IV uterovaginal prolapse
Completed
- Conditions
- terovaginal prolapseUterovaginal prolapseReproductive Health and Childbirth - Other reproductive health and childbirth disordersSurgery - Surgical techniquesRenal and Urogenital - Other renal and urogenital disorders
- Registration Number
- ACTRN12615000427572
- Lead Sponsor
- alexandria university, faculty of medicne
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Completed
- Sex
- Female
- Target Recruitment
- 30
Inclusion Criteria
1.Grade III or IV uterovaginal prolapse according to the pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q).
2.Uterine or vault prolapse .
3.Normal uterus and ovaries on ultrasound examination.
4.Normal menstrual bleeding pattern (if premenopausal).
5.Normal Pap smear.
Exclusion Criteria
1.Inability to give informed consent or to return for follows up.
2.Unable to undergo general anaesthesia.
3.Prior sacral colpopexy.
4.Patients presenting with lower grade prolapse.
5.Genuine stress incontinence.
6.Indication for hysterectomy
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method duration of hospital stay<br>[At hospital discharge<br>];recurrence of Uterovaginal prolapse[followup by POP-Q at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months post surgery. ]
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Intra- and postoperative complications such as bladder , rectal injuries.<br>[ Intra-operatively and up to 24 hours post-operative.<br>];quality of life by using SF-36 Quality of Life Questionnaire [quality of life will be assessed at 1,6,12 months postoperative ];satisfaction by SF-36 Quality of Life Questionnaire and visual analogue bother score .[visual analogue score (VAS) score and questionnaire will be assessed at 1,6,12 months postoperative ]