Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT05013060
NCT05013060
Completed
Not Applicable

An Assessment of the Efficacy of Microencapsulated Sodium Butyrate and a Probiotic Mixture in Patients With Irritable Bowel Syndrome - a Randomized Double-blind Placebo-controlled Study

Nordic Biotic Sp. z o.o.1 site in 1 country120 target enrollmentStarted: April 15, 2021Last updated:

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Enrollment
120
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Improvement or worsening of IBS global symptoms using Global Improvement Scale (IBS-GIS)

Overview

Brief Summary

According to current IBS management guidelines, probiotic administration reduces IBS-associated symptoms and improves the quality of life. The purpose of this study is to assess the effects of the combined formulation comprising microencapsulated sodium butyrate and a probiotic mixture of two Lactobacillus strains (L. rhamnosus and L. acidophilus) and three Bifidobacterium strains (B. longum, B. bifidum, and B. lactis) on the incidence and severity of clinical symptoms in patients diagnosed with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) based on the Rome IV criteria.

Microencapsulated sodium butyrate is a short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) with biological effects on the gastrointestinal mucosa; it constitutes a key source of energy for enterocytes. Butyrate was shown to have a trophic effect on the colon epithelium and to help restore the disrupted structural and functional integrity of the gastrointestinal tract. These unique properties of sodium butyrate result in its beneficial effects on the abdominal symptoms (such as diarrhea, constipation, abdominal pain) in patients with IBS. This study will assess the effects of the mixture of sodium butyrate and multi-strain probiotic on the rate and severity of clinical symptoms in IBS patients, by taking into account their nutritional status and body composition.

Detailed Description

The study schedule includes five visits:the screening/baseline visit, whose purpose is to qualify patients to be included in the study, the randomization visit (visit 0), at which patients will be given a probiotic/butyric acid or placebo, and three follow-up visits (at weeks 4, 8, and 12 after randomization).

All patients will undergo:

  1. A physical examination - at each visit;
  2. Nutritional status assessment - at visit 0 and at weeks 4 and 12 of treatment;
  3. Anthropometric measurements - at visit 0 and at weeks 4 and 12 of treatment;
  4. Body composition analysis via bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) with the use of a Bodystat machine - at visit 0 and at 4 and 12 weeks of treatment;
  5. Laboratory tests (including complete blood count; liver function tests; bilirubin, amylase, creatinine, CRP, and glucose levels; electrolytes; and an SARS-CoV2 antigen cassette test conducted by a doctor) at the screening visit; and cytokines (IL-6 and macrophage inflammatory protein 1β (MIP-1ß)) at visit 0 and at weeks 4 and 12 of treatment;
  6. Disease severity will be rated with the IBS symptom severity score (IBS-SSS) developed by Francis, Morris, and Whorwell, with mild, moderate, and severe cases indicated by scores of <175, 175-300, and >300, respectively. In addition, the following scales will be used to assess IBS treatment efficacy: IBS-Quality of Life (IBS-QOL), IBS-Global Improvement Scale (IBS-GIS), and IBS - Adequate Relief (IBS-AR).
  7. The number and type of bowel movements will be assessed with the Bristol Stool Formation scale.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to 70 Years (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • Males and females aged from 18 to 70 years, inclusive;
  • Good physical and mental condition assessed based on the patient's history and physical examination;
  • Laboratory test results (complete blood count, blood chemistry panel) within normal limits or considered not to be clinically significant by the Investigator; negative SARS-CoV-2 antibody test;
  • A voluntarily provided written informed consent;
  • Diagnosis of IBS based on the Rome IV criteria, e.g. recurrent abdominal pain at least one day a week for the last three months, associated with two or more of the following symptoms (these should be present for the last three months, with the onset of symptoms six months before diagnosis):
  • related to defecation
  • associated with a change in stool frequency and/or
  • associated with a change in stool form (appearance)
  • Patients with any of the following forms of IBS will be included:
  • IBS-D - more than 25% of BSF type 6 and 7 stools, and less than 25% of type 1 and 2 stools.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Unclassified IBS;
  • Cardiovascular disorders: uncontrolled hypertension (blood pressure \>170/100 mmHg), cerebrovascular disease;
  • Respiratory disorders (asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease \[COPD\]).
  • Hepatic impairment (including status post cholecystectomy), renal impairment, and unexplained blood biochemistry abnormalities: serum creatinine levels over twice the upper limit of normal, AST or ALT levels over twice the upper limit of normal.
  • Gastrointestinal conditions other than IBS, including clinical or endoscopic diagnosis of gastroenteritis.
  • Endocrine disorders, including diabetes mellitus (fasting blood glucose \>11 mmol/L) and elevated TSH levels.
  • Severe neurological conditions, with psychosis;
  • Malignancy;
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding;
  • Hypersensitivity to soy;

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Improvement or worsening of IBS global symptoms using Global Improvement Scale (IBS-GIS)

Time Frame: Improvement/worsening assessed after 4, 8 and 12 weeks of intervention

IBS-Global Improvement Scale asseses IBS symptoms using a patient-defined 7 point Linkert scale ranging from symptoms substantially worse to substantially improved. Patients answer the question "Have you felt any change in the severity of your symptoms over the past 7 days compared to how you felt before the medicine was given? The answers are recorded based on the 7-point scale: 1. = I feel that the symptoms have worsened significantly 2. = I feel that the symptoms have moderately worsened 3. = I feel that the symptoms have slightly worsened 4. = I feel no change 5. = I feel a slight improvement 6. = I feel moderate improvement 7. = I feel significant improvement IBS-GIS score indicates: improvement if is \>4 or worsening if is\<4, no change if is 4.

Changes in an adequate relief

Time Frame: Adequate Relief after 4, 8 and 12 weeks of interventions

IBS-Adequate Relief (IBS-AR) is a dichotomous single item that asks participants "Over the past week (7 days) have you had adequate relief of your IBS symptoms? The answer is YES or NO.

Changes in Quality of Life

Time Frame: Quality of Life from baseline at 4, 8 and 12 weeks of intervention

The IBS-Quality of Life (IBS-QOL) is a 34-item measure assessing the degree to which IBS interferes with patient quality of life. Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale, thus yielding a total score that has a theoretical range of 34 to 170, with higher scores indicating worse QOL.

Changes in severity of IBS symptoms using IBS Severity Scoring System (IBS-SSS)

Time Frame: Severity of symptoms from baseline at 4, 8 and 12 weeks of intervention

IBS-SSS is a 5-question survey that asks: 1. the severity of abdominal pain, 2. frequency of abdominal pain, 3. severity of abdominal distention, 4.dissatisfaction with bowel habit, and 5. interference with quality of life over the past 10 days. Subjects respond to each question on a 100-point visual analogue scale. Each of the five question generates a maximum score of 100 point, and total scores can range from 0-500 with higher scores indicating severe symptoms.

Secondary Outcomes

  • Changes in number and type of stools(From baseline for 12 weeks of intervention in 1 week intervals)
  • Body composition analysis(From baseline at 4 and 12 weeks of intervention)
  • Changes in severity of pain(From baseline for 12 weeks of intervention in 1 week intervals)
  • Changes in Body Mass Index (BMI)(From baseline at 4 and 12 weeks of intervention)
  • Changes in flatulence/abdominal distension(From baseline for 12 weeks of intervention in 1 week intervals)

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Industry
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Anita Gąsiorowska

MD, PhD

Nordic Biotic Sp. z o.o.

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials