MedPath

Laparoscopic Versus Vaginal Hysterectomy in Women With Abnormal Uterine Bleeding Using Bipolar Vessel Sealer

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Uterine Bleeding
Interventions
Procedure: Laparoscopic hysterectomy
Procedure: Vaginal hysterectomy
Registration Number
NCT04237558
Lead Sponsor
Mansoura University
Brief Summary

This study will be a randomized clinical trial to evaluate the surgical performance and outcome of total laparoscopic hysterectomy compared to non-descent vaginal hysterectomy ,using bipolar vessel sealer,in cases of abnormal uterine bleeding in Mansoura University Hospital in order to reach the optimum technique for our locality

Detailed Description

Hysterectomy is the surgical removal of the uterus. It is the commonest major gynecological surgery, next to caesarean section, with millions of procedures performed annually throughout the world.Approximately 90% of hysterectomies are performed for benign conditions.

Although there are many approaches to hysterectomy, which depend on clinical criteria, certain patients may be eligible to be operated in any of the several available approaches. The optimal route of hysterectomy for a patient will depend on the pathological nature, size and shape of the vagina and uterus, uterine descent, endometriosis and the likelihood of pelvic adhesions, adnexal masses, previous pelvic surgery, available hospital technology, devices and the surgeon's preference.

Approaches to hysterectomy may be broadly categorized into four options: abdominal hysterectomy (AH); vaginal hysterectomy (VH); laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH) where at least some of the operation is conducted laparoscopically and robotic-assisted hysterectomy (RH).Vaginal and laparoscopic procedures are considered "minimally invasive" surgical approaches because they do not require a large abdominal incision and, thus, typically are associated with shortened hospitalization and postoperative recovery times compared with open abdominal hysterectomy.

This study will be a randomized clinical trial to evaluate the surgical performance and outcome of total laparoscopic hysterectomy compared to non-descent vaginal hysterectomy, using bipolar vessel sealer, in cases of abnormal uterine bleeding in order to reach the optimum technique with lower cost to be easily applied to low resource settings.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
Female
Target Recruitment
52
Inclusion Criteria
  • Women assigned for performing hysterectomy for abnormal uterine bleeding due to benign pathology.
  • Uterine size by bimanual examination ≤14 weeks gestational size.
  • Cases with uterine volumes ≤ 400cm3 will be included in this study.
Read More
Exclusion Criteria
  • Patients with BMI > 30kg/m2
  • Uteri > 14 weeks gestational size by bimanual examination or volume > 400cm3
  • Women with positive pap smear for CIN or endometrial biopsy with atypia or carcinoma.
  • Patient with other known body malignancy.
  • Patient with other pelvic pathology, endometriosis or pelvic abscesses.
  • Patients with abdominal scars.
Read More

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Laparoscopic hysterectomyLaparoscopic hysterectomyKey hole surgery through small incisions of the abdomen
Vaginal hysterectomyVaginal hysterectomyRemoval of uterus through vagina in absence of prolapse
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Duration of operationFrom start of surgery up to 24 hours

Duration of operation

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Time of requiring analgesicsUntil 24 hours postoperatively

The time of the first request for analgesics

Number of requiring analgesicsUntil 24 hours postoperatively

The number of requests for analgesics

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Mansoura University Hospital

🇪🇬

Mansoura, Dakahlia, Egypt

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath