Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT03962153
NCT03962153
Completed
Not Applicable

New Ultrasonographic Parameters for Fetal Weight Prediction

University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli"1 site in 1 country300 target enrollmentJanuary 1, 2019

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Fetal Growth Abnormality
Sponsor
University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli"
Enrollment
300
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
transtentorial diameter
Status
Completed
Last Updated
6 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

The hypothesis is to increase the predictability of the ultrasound examination evaluating new fetal parameters: in fact the thickness of the soft tissues can contribute significantly to the fetal weight and the characteristics of the thoracic cage may correlate with the fetal weight.

Detailed Description

Estimation of fetal weight (EFW: Estimated Fetal Weight) with ultrasound examination is a common practice in obstetrics and is important for planning the mode and timing of birth, especially in pregnancies at risk for altered fetal growth. The conditions most commonly associated with impaired fetal growth are: * IUGR: in these cases the ultrasound estimate of fetal weight is fundamental to decide the timing of delivery, since the neonatal outcome correlates positively with the fetal weight as well as with the flowmetry parameters * fetal macrosomia (fetal weight greater than 4500 g) associated or not with gestational diabetes: in such cases an accurate estimation of the fetal weight is necessary and careful evaluation of any fetal-pelvic disproportion to decide both the timing of the birth that can be anticipated compared to at the physiological end of pregnancy is the mode of birth, vaginal or laparotomic in the event of a pelvic fetus disproportion. In the 1970s the estimate of fetal weight was based on the measurement of the symphysis-fundus uterine distance (SFH) for which: * SFH \<33 cm: predictive of a fetal weight \<3100 gr * SFH\> 34 cm: predictive of a fetal weight = o\> 4000 gr. At present, the fetal weight estimate is performed with biometric ultrasound parameters: * DBP: biparietal diameter * HC: head circumference * AC: abdominal circumference * FL: femur length There are standardized tables of variation of these parameters according to the gestational epoch for which the knowledge of the correct gestational epoch is fundamental for the correct interpretation of the data. The fetal weight is calculated using mathematical formulas automatically obtained from ultrasound equipment of which the most used: * Shepard's formula as a function of BPD and AC. * formula of Campbell and Wilkin: it is in function of the abdominal circumference * Hadlock formula: use the combination of different biometric parameters (BPD-HC-AC-FL). Even if the guidelines provide for three ultrasound examinations for physiological pregnancies (one for each trimester of pregnancy), it is common practice to evaluate the biometric ultrasound parameters at the end of pregnancy and in any case when the patient is admitted for the delivery. It is obvious that in this time of pregnancy a closer correlation between biometric parameters and fetal weight is observed. The problems related to the ultrasound estimation of fetal weight are represented by: * significant intra-operator variability * reduced accuracy for extremes of fetal weight (small or macrosomic fetuses) * about 10% discrepancy between estimated fetal weight on an echographic basis according to Hadlock and actual weight of the newborn at birth.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
January 1, 2019
End Date
April 18, 2019
Last Updated
6 years ago
Study Type
Observational
Sex
Female

Investigators

Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Prof. Pasquale De Franciscis

Associate Professor

University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli"

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • pregnant women

Exclusion Criteria

  • fetal structural and / or chromosomal anomalies
  • multiple pregnancies
  • premature births (gestational age \<37w)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

transtentorial diameter

Time Frame: 9 months

Evaluation of transtentorial diameter

femur length

Time Frame: 9 months

Evaluation of femur length

distance between L1-L4 lumbar vertebrae

Time Frame: 9 months

Evaluation of distance between L1-L4

head circumference

Time Frame: 9 months

evaluation of head circumference

abdominal circumference

Time Frame: 9 months

Evaluation of abdominal circumference

Fetal Weight

Time Frame: 9 months

Evaluation of Fetal Weight

biparietal diameter

Time Frame: 9 months

Evaluation of biparietal diameter

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials