跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT04619615
NCT04619615Unknown不适用

Increasing Access to Evidence-based Treatments for Depression: The Development and Evaluation of a Digital Training Platform for Interpersonal Psychotherapy.

Mount Sinai Hospital, Canada8 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 44 人开始时间: 2020年7月27日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
入组人数
44
试验地点
8
主要终点
Participation rate - resident participants

研究概览

简要总结

The goal of this single-blind, randomized controlled pilot study is to evaluate the acceptability and feasibility of an Interpersonal Psychotherapy (IPT) asynchronous self-directed digital training platform for psychiatry residents, as compared to synchronous large group online workshop teaching. This study has the potential to improve access to competency-based training and dissemination of IPT, impacting healthcare delivery with increasing access to this evidence-based psychological depression treatment.

详细描述

Background/Rational

The COVID-19 pandemic is expected to have an unprecedented impact on the mental health and well-being of patients, healthcare workers and our society at large. Among these illnesses, depression is expected to be the most prevalent to emerge and is already the leading cause of disability worldwide; it affects up to 1.8 million Canadians. While physical distancing is required to curb the spread of COVID-19, it is well known that social isolation is a substantive risk factor of mental illness and suicide.

Effective treatments exist but as few as 20% of Canadians receive minimally-adequate treatment for depression. One effective treatment for depression includes Interpersonal Psychotherapy (IPT) which may be particularly relevant for the isolation and life changes brought on by the COVID-19 pandemic. IPT is recommended in key consensus guidelines from the World Health Organization and the Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments. IPT is a brief, structured psychological treatment that has been shown to effectively reduce depressive symptoms and enhance remission rates for patients across the lifespan. IPT proposes that the key to reducing depression is to increase connection with social supports and help patients work through triggering interpersonal experiences of loss/grief, life changes/social role transitions, interpersonal sensitivity/loneliness, or relational conflicts/role disputes. We selected IPT for three reasons: i) its strong evidence base for effectiveness as an antidepressant treatment, comparable in efficacy to CBT, with fewer patients dropping out of treatments; ii) its effectiveness in treating depression among culturally diverse patients across the lifespan; and iii) its parsimonious approach that is easy to understand and implement. This is critical when training novice clinicians. The poor dissemination of effective psychological therapies such as IPT is partly due to the limited number of available mental health professionals who can train novice clinicians with high fidelity; and one key obstacle is how these individuals are trained. Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, this typically involved a trainee attending an expert-led workshop and then practicing the treatment under the supervision of someone experienced in delivering that treatment. The recent development of digital training platforms in various psychological treatments has attempted to address this training gap. In addition, web-conferencing applications have opened the door for distance psychotherapy training and supervision.

Online training methods need to be developed and examined to address this significant bottleneck, particularly in light of the current COVID-19 pandemic where in-person trainings have stopped but the need for evidence-based psychotherapy grows. The current study aims to examine two online training methods with consenting psychiatry resident/trainee therapists: a) asynchronous self-directed training through a novel digital training course which they will complete on their own schedule; and b) synchronous large group workshop where residents will participate in a live training workshop at a specific time. Asynchronous training is a more cost-effective and scalable method of training which permits residents (and other trainees) to learn psychotherapy according to their preferred schedules. To date, several asynchronous IPT training courses have been developed, however none have been compared to synchronous large group online workshop. The current study will provide preliminary evidence to examine the acceptability and feasibility of both models among psychiatry residents at University of Toronto affiliated hospitals.

Purpose

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Other
盲法
Single (Participant)

盲法说明

Patient participants will be blind to which training modality their resident therapist has been randomized to.

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • 未提供

排除标准

  • 未提供

结局指标

主要结局

Participation rate - resident participants

时间窗: Assessed throughout the 2-3 weeks training period.

Percentage of resident participants who complete the online modules and homework assignments for the intervention vs control.

Recruitment rate - resident and patient participants

时间窗: 1.5 year recruitment period

Number recruited per site per month for the intervention arm vs the control arm

Retention rate - resident and patient participants

时间窗: two years

Percentage of patient and resident participants retained and assessed with valid primary outcome data for the intervention vs control.

次要结局

  • Acceptability of the intervention(Immediately after resident participants' final session with their IPT patient.)
  • Therapeutic alliance - patient participants(At week 3 and week 12.)
  • Anxiety - patient participant(up to 12 weeks)
  • IPT knowledge - resident participant(Baseline and at 12 weeks.)
  • Depression - patient participant(up to 12 weeks)
  • Patient improvement - resident participant(up to 12 weeks)
  • Counseling self-efficacy - resident participant(Baseline and the 12-week course of therapy.)
  • Therapy quality - resident participant(up to 12 weeks)
  • Resident competence - resident participant(Immediately after the intervention.)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (8)

Loading locations...

相似试验