ReActiv8 Stimulation Therapy vs Optimal Medical Management: A Randomized Evaluation
- Conditions
- Chronic Low-back Pain
- Registration Number
- NCT04803214
- Lead Sponsor
- Mainstay Medical
- Brief Summary
This study is a prospective, randomized study comparing ReActiv8 Therapy to Optimal Medical Management (OMM).
- Detailed Description
This study is a prospective, randomized study comparing ReActiv8 Therapy to Optimal Medical Management (OMM), where OMM means the patient is managed according to available guideline-directed treatments (e.g., medication, physical therapy, injections) individualized to meet the patient needs. All patients who satisfy the enrollment criteria are randomized (1:1) to receive either ReActiv8 (Treatment group) or OMM (Control group).
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 203
- Age ≥21 years
- Evidence of lumbar multifidus muscle dysfunction
- Intractable Chronic Low Back Pain that has persisted >6 months resulting in pain most of the days in the past 12 months
- Failed therapy including pain medications and physical therapy
- Not a candidate for spine surgery
- Low Back Pain NRS of ≥6 and ≤9
- Oswestry Disability Index score ≥30 and ≤60
- Willing and capable of giving Informed Consent
- Able to comply with this protocol
- On Optimal Medical Management per the Investigator
- Contraindicated for the ReActiv8 System
- BMI > 35
- Any surgical correction procedure for scoliosis at any time, or a current clinical diagnosis of moderate to severe scoliosis
- An independent MRI assessment identifying a pathology that is likely the cause of the CLBP and is amenable to surgery
- Leg pain described as being worse than back pain, or radiculopathy (neuropathic pain) below the knee
- Any condition unrelated to CLBP which, in the opinion of the Investigator, could limit physical movement or compliance with the protocol, or interfere with the assessment of efficacy
- Surgical and other procedure exclusions
- Psycho-social exclusions
- Protocol compliance exclusions
- General exclusions
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Change in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) 1 year Comparison of 1-year change from baseline in ODI between Treatment and Control with MMRM for missing data.
ODI is measured on a scale of 0 to 100 where a lower score is a better outcome.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Change in Low Back Pain Numerical Rating Scale (LBP NRS) 1 year Comparison of 1-year change from baseline in LBP NRS between Treatment and Control with MMRM for missing data.
NRS is measured on a scale of 0 to 10 where a higher score is a better outcome.Change in EQ-5D 1 year Comparison of 1-year change from baseline in EQ-5D between Treatment and Control with MMRM for missing data.
EQ-5D is measured on a scale of -0.5 to 1.0 where a higher score is a better outcome.
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.
Trial Locations
- Locations (28)
SoCal Sport and Spine
🇺🇸Newport Beach, California, United States
Barrow Brain & Spine
🇺🇸Phoenix, Arizona, United States
University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
🇺🇸Little Rock, Arkansas, United States
Pacific Research Institute
🇺🇸Santa Rosa, California, United States
University of Colorado
🇺🇸Aurora, Colorado, United States
International Spine, Pain and Performance Center
🇺🇸Washington, District of Columbia, United States
Cleveland Clinic Martin Health Tradition Hospital
🇺🇸Port Saint Lucie, Florida, United States
Cantor Spine Center and Paley Orthopedic Spine Institute
🇺🇸West Palm Beach, Florida, United States
Augusta Orthopedic & Sports Medicine Specialists
🇺🇸Augusta, Georgia, United States
Horizon Clinical Research
🇺🇸Fayetteville, Georgia, United States
Scroll for more (18 remaining)SoCal Sport and Spine🇺🇸Newport Beach, California, United States