Skip to main content
MedPathMedPath Home
Clinical Trials/CTRI/2018/01/011320
CTRI/2018/01/011320
Not yet recruiting
未知

TWO-HOURLY VERSUS THREE-HOURLY FEEDING FOR VERY LOW BIRTH-WEIGHT INFANTS: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIA

one0 sites0 target enrollmentTBD
Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to LinkedInShare to Reddit

Overview

Phase
未知
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Not specified
Sponsor
one
Status
Not yet recruiting
Last Updated
4 years ago
OverviewInvestigatorsEligibility CriteriaOutcomesSimilar Trials

Overview

Brief Summary

No summary available.

Registry
who.int
Start Date
TBD
End Date
TBD
Last Updated
4 years ago
Study Type
Interventional

Investigators

Sponsor
one

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • •Al inborn neonates weighing between 1000\-1500g in whom enteral feeding would be started within 96 hours of life

Exclusion Criteria

  • •1\-Major congenital malformation including Tracheo\-Esophageal Fistula, Oesophageal
  • •Atresia, Duodenal atresia interfering or delaying the feed initiation.
  • •2\-Chromosomal abnormalities,
  • •3\-Perinatal asphyxia (APGAR score of \<5 at 5min) or encephalopathy due to any
  • •ï?? out born status,
  • •ï?? Intestinal perforation before initiation of feeding,
  • •ï?? Infants with Absent or Reversed End Diastolic Flow(AEDF/REDF) in antenatal USG
  • •ï?? Infants who are severely sick, on invasive ventilation or shock,
  • •ï?? Infants in whom enteral feeding could not be started within 96 hours of life.

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Not specified

Similar Trials

Not yet recruiting
Not Applicable
To determine whether 3-hourly feeding interval is better as compare to standardized 2-hourly feeding interval in newborns between 1 kg to 1.5 kg birth weightHealth Condition 1: Z001- Encounter for newborn, infant andchild health examinations
CTRI/2023/03/050485ARPIT PARASHAR
Not yet recruiting
Not Applicable
conventional feeding vs traditional increased interval of feeding in small for gestational age noenate
CTRI/2024/06/068507VMMC and Safdarjung hospital
Completed
Not Applicable
COMPARISON OF 3 HOURLY VERSUS 2 HOURLY FEEDING INTERVAL REGIMEN IN VERY LOW BIRTH WEIGHT PRETERM BABIESHealth Condition 1: null- admitte preterm babies less than 1500 grams eligible for feeding
CTRI/2017/11/010354Department Of Neonatology84
Recruiting
Not Applicable
2 hourly versus 3 hourly feeding in premature infants: A randomised control trialFeeding premature infantReproductive Health and Childbirth - Complications of newborn
ACTRN12611000676910Short Term Grant, School Of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia150
Completed
Phase 3
Impact of two hourly versus three hourly feeding schedules on time to reach full feeds in neonates
CTRI/2014/02/004436Surya Childrens Hospital120