Effect of Joint Mobilization on Muscle Activation and Function in Individuals With Chronic Ankle Instability
Overview
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Ankle Sprain
- Sponsor
- Creighton University
- Enrollment
- 30
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- Changes in Muscle activation
- Status
- Completed
- Last Updated
- 8 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to examine the effects of a gentle pressure movement performed at the ankle by a physical therapist on muscle function and ankle motion in individuals who frequently twist (sprain) their ankle.
Detailed Description
Novel rehabilitation methods, that specifically target decreased muscle activation due to joint pathology prior to strength training, have elicited greater improvements in muscle function and self-reported disability compared to traditional therapies. Preliminary evidence suggests ankle joint mobilization can improve contributions of spinal influences on ankle muscle activation in individuals with ankle joint pathology, but there is a considerable gap in understanding cortical contributions to muscle activation following joint injury. It is unknown how joint mobilization concurrently affects cortical and spinal neural motor pathways, as well as clinical measures of patient function. The overall aim of this grant is to determine the immediate effects of talocrural joint mobilization on cortical and spinal muscle activation of the fibularis longus (peroneus) and soleus muscles in individuals with chronic ankle instability (CAI). The secondary aims of this study will examine changes in ankle dorsiflexion range of motion (ROM) and dynamic balance. This innovate approach will provide the necessary scientific knowledge regarding the potential mechanism and efficacy of joint mobilization.
Investigators
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •Age 16-45 years
- •History of one or more ankle sprains
- •Scoring at least an 85% on the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) Sport or at least 3 on the Modified Ankle Instability Instrument (AII).
- •At least 5° ankle dorsiflexion asymmetry compared to the contralateral limb OR ankle dorsiflexion ROM less than 21°
Exclusion Criteria
- •Lower extremity injury or surgery within the past 6 months (including lateral ankle sprain)
- •Diagnosed ankle osteoarthritis
- •History of ankle surgery that involves intra-articular fixation
- •Medical conditions which would be contraindications to mobilization/manipulation and/or transcranial magnetic stimulation, including cardiac pacemaker, metal implants in the head, current pregnancy, neurological disorders, recent use of stimulants or medications known to lower seizure threshold, and personal or family history of seizures
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Changes in Muscle activation
Time Frame: Baseline and immediately after each manual therapy intervention; 1 week study
To determine cortical and spinal changes in muscle activation of the fibularis longus and soleus following one of three intervention protocols. Changes in cortical and spinal muscle activation will be measured by examining resting motor threshold via Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and the H-reflex technique, respectively. The investigators hypothesize that the higher intensity talocrural joint mobilization will result in a greater increase in cortical and spinal activation of the fibularis longus and soleus muscles than the lower intensity talocrural joint mobilization.
Changes in Ankle dorsiflexion ROM
Time Frame: Baseline and immediately after each manual therapy intervention; 1 week study
To determine the changes in ankle dorsiflexion ROM following one of two talocrural joint mobilization techniques (higher or lower intensity) or control intervention in individuals with CAI. Changes in ankle dorsiflexion ROM will be quantified using a weight bearing lunge. The investigators hypothesize that the higher intensity (Grade V) talocrural joint mobilization will result in a greater improvement in ankle dorsiflexion ROM than the lower intensity (Grade IV) talocrural joint mobilization and the control intervention will result in no change in ROM.
Changes in Dynamic Balance
Time Frame: Baseline and immediately after each manual therapy intervention; 1 week study
To determine the acute changes in balance following one of two talocrural joint mobilization techniques or control intervention in individuals with CAI. Changes in balance will be quantified using the anterior, posteromedial, and posterolateral components of the Star Excursion Balance Test. The investigators hypothesize that the higher intensity talocrural joint mobilization will result in greater improvements in reach distance in all three SEBT directions compared to the lower intensity talocrural joint mobilization.