MedPath

Vestibular Socket Therapy (VST) Versus Partial Extraction Therapy

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Dental Implants
Registration Number
NCT05112796
Lead Sponsor
Hams Hamed Abdelrahman
Brief Summary

The current randomized clinical trial aimed to compare the VST versus Partial Extraction Therapy (PET) for immediate implant placement in the esthetic zone in class I fresh extraction sites.

The primary outcome was the assessment of vertical dimensional changes in peri-implant soft tissue margin.

The secondary outcome was the assessment of radiographic changes in the thickness of the facial peri-implant tissues.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
16
Inclusion Criteria
  • single hopeless maxillary tooth in the esthetic zone
  • non-smokers
  • systemically healthy
  • Class I extraction sites
Exclusion Criteria
  • smoking
  • Class II and III extraction sites
  • hopeless teeth with acute infection or vertical/horizontal root fracture

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Changes in the peri-implant facial tissue thicknessat baseline and 6 months

through CBCT images (Carestream 8000D- Carestream Dental) that were taken at baseline and 6 months postoperatively

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Private Practice Clinic

🇪🇬

Alexandria, Egypt

Private Practice Clinic
🇪🇬Alexandria, Egypt

MedPath

Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.

© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.