High Flow Therapy vs Hypertonic Saline in Bronchiolitis
- Conditions
- Acute Viral Bronchiolitis
- Interventions
- Registration Number
- NCT01873144
- Lead Sponsor
- Ministry of Health, Spain
- Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to demonstrate that heated, humidified, high-flow nasal cannula (HHHFNC) is superior to hypertonic saline solution (HSS) in the treatment of moderate acute viral bronchiolitis in infants in improving respiratory distress and comfort and reducing length of hospital stay (LOS) and admission to Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU).
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 75
- Children aged 6 months or less
- Moderate (Respiratory Distress Assessment Instrument score of 4 or greater) viral bronchiolitis (as defined by McConnockie)
- Meeting Admission criteria
- History of prematurity
- Chronic lung disease
- Cystic fibrosis
- Congenital heart disease
- Neuromuscular disease
- Airway anomalies
- Immunodeficiency
- Those requiring immediate intubation and ventilation.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description HSS (3%) + epinephrine Epinephrine 1/1000 Nebulized solution containing 0.5 mL/kg (maximum 3 mL) of epinephrine 1/1000 plus 2 mL of HSS(3%) every 4h for three times and afterwards at physician in charge criteria. HHHFNC+epinephrine+Normal Saline(0.9%) Epinephrine 1/1000 Flow depending on weight (Tidal volume x respiratory rate x 9) and nebulized solution containing 0.5 mL/kg (maximum 3 mL) of epinephrine 1/1000 plus 2 mL of Normal Saline (NS) (0.9%) every 4h and afterwards at physician in charge criteria. HSS (3%) + epinephrine HSS 3% Nebulized solution containing 0.5 mL/kg (maximum 3 mL) of epinephrine 1/1000 plus 2 mL of HSS(3%) every 4h for three times and afterwards at physician in charge criteria. HHHFNC+epinephrine+Normal Saline(0.9%) HHHFNC Flow depending on weight (Tidal volume x respiratory rate x 9) and nebulized solution containing 0.5 mL/kg (maximum 3 mL) of epinephrine 1/1000 plus 2 mL of Normal Saline (NS) (0.9%) every 4h and afterwards at physician in charge criteria. HHHFNC+epinephrine+Normal Saline(0.9%) NS (0.9%) Flow depending on weight (Tidal volume x respiratory rate x 9) and nebulized solution containing 0.5 mL/kg (maximum 3 mL) of epinephrine 1/1000 plus 2 mL of Normal Saline (NS) (0.9%) every 4h and afterwards at physician in charge criteria.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Difference in mean Respiratory Assessment Change Score (RACS) between groups in every time considered Every 4h for three consecutive times beginning in the moment of inclusion in the study and after every 8h for three consecutive times (average of 36h) RACS is calculated by combining 2 values: the difference between the Respiratory Distress Assessment Instrument (RDAI) score before and after treatment, plus a value of +1 for each 10% improvement (decrease) in the posttreatment respiratory rate (RR) or a value of -1 for each 10% worsening (increase) in RR.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Difference in mean comfort score along the monitoring period between groups Every 8h for 6 consecutive times (two days) beginning in the moment of inclusion in the study A scale was used for comfort evaluation . It is based on 4 items: rest, feeding, alertness and facial expression (facial pictures).Minimum 4-Maximum 16
Trial Locations
- Locations (2)
Hospital Universitario Fundacion Alcorcon
🇪🇸Alcorcon, Madrid, Spain
Hospital Universitario Severo Ochoa
🇪🇸Leganes, Madrid, Spain