MedPath

High Flow Therapy vs Hypertonic Saline in Bronchiolitis

Phase 3
Completed
Conditions
Acute Viral Bronchiolitis
Interventions
Drug: HSS 3%
Device: HHHFNC
Drug: NS (0.9%)
Registration Number
NCT01873144
Lead Sponsor
Ministry of Health, Spain
Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to demonstrate that heated, humidified, high-flow nasal cannula (HHHFNC) is superior to hypertonic saline solution (HSS) in the treatment of moderate acute viral bronchiolitis in infants in improving respiratory distress and comfort and reducing length of hospital stay (LOS) and admission to Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU).

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
75
Inclusion Criteria
  • Children aged 6 months or less
  • Moderate (Respiratory Distress Assessment Instrument score of 4 or greater) viral bronchiolitis (as defined by McConnockie)
  • Meeting Admission criteria
Exclusion Criteria
  • History of prematurity
  • Chronic lung disease
  • Cystic fibrosis
  • Congenital heart disease
  • Neuromuscular disease
  • Airway anomalies
  • Immunodeficiency
  • Those requiring immediate intubation and ventilation.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
HSS (3%) + epinephrineEpinephrine 1/1000Nebulized solution containing 0.5 mL/kg (maximum 3 mL) of epinephrine 1/1000 plus 2 mL of HSS(3%) every 4h for three times and afterwards at physician in charge criteria.
HHHFNC+epinephrine+Normal Saline(0.9%)Epinephrine 1/1000Flow depending on weight (Tidal volume x respiratory rate x 9) and nebulized solution containing 0.5 mL/kg (maximum 3 mL) of epinephrine 1/1000 plus 2 mL of Normal Saline (NS) (0.9%) every 4h and afterwards at physician in charge criteria.
HSS (3%) + epinephrineHSS 3%Nebulized solution containing 0.5 mL/kg (maximum 3 mL) of epinephrine 1/1000 plus 2 mL of HSS(3%) every 4h for three times and afterwards at physician in charge criteria.
HHHFNC+epinephrine+Normal Saline(0.9%)HHHFNCFlow depending on weight (Tidal volume x respiratory rate x 9) and nebulized solution containing 0.5 mL/kg (maximum 3 mL) of epinephrine 1/1000 plus 2 mL of Normal Saline (NS) (0.9%) every 4h and afterwards at physician in charge criteria.
HHHFNC+epinephrine+Normal Saline(0.9%)NS (0.9%)Flow depending on weight (Tidal volume x respiratory rate x 9) and nebulized solution containing 0.5 mL/kg (maximum 3 mL) of epinephrine 1/1000 plus 2 mL of Normal Saline (NS) (0.9%) every 4h and afterwards at physician in charge criteria.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Difference in mean Respiratory Assessment Change Score (RACS) between groups in every time consideredEvery 4h for three consecutive times beginning in the moment of inclusion in the study and after every 8h for three consecutive times (average of 36h)

RACS is calculated by combining 2 values: the difference between the Respiratory Distress Assessment Instrument (RDAI) score before and after treatment, plus a value of +1 for each 10% improvement (decrease) in the posttreatment respiratory rate (RR) or a value of -1 for each 10% worsening (increase) in RR.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Difference in mean comfort score along the monitoring period between groupsEvery 8h for 6 consecutive times (two days) beginning in the moment of inclusion in the study

A scale was used for comfort evaluation . It is based on 4 items: rest, feeding, alertness and facial expression (facial pictures).Minimum 4-Maximum 16

Trial Locations

Locations (2)

Hospital Universitario Fundacion Alcorcon

🇪🇸

Alcorcon, Madrid, Spain

Hospital Universitario Severo Ochoa

🇪🇸

Leganes, Madrid, Spain

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath