Study of Inter- and Intra-rater Reliability of the Clinician Erythema Assessment Scale
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 发起方
- Allergan
- 入组人数
- 104
- 主要终点
- Inter-rater Reliability of the Clinician Erythema Assessment (CEA) Scale
研究概览
简要总结
This is a study to evaluate inter- and intra-rater reliability of the Clinician Erythema Assessment Scale. There is no treatment (intervention) associated with this study.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Observational
- 观察模型
- Case Only
- 时间视角
- Prospective
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 —（Adult, Older Adult）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- 未提供
排除标准
- •Unwilling to remove all facial make-up
研究组 & 干预措施
All participants
Patients with facial erythema associated with rosacea. There was no intervention in this study.
干预措施: No Intervention (Drug)
结局指标
主要结局
Inter-rater Reliability of the Clinician Erythema Assessment (CEA) Scale
时间窗: Day 1
Inter-rater agreement (among raters) of the CEA scores (0=clear skin with no signs of erythema; 1=almost clear of erythema, slight redness; 2=mild erythema, definite redness; 3=moderate erythema, marked redness; 4=severe erythema, fiery redness) evaluated using Kendall's coefficient of concordance (Kendall's W). Each of 7 raters scored 104 participant's severity of erythema due to rosacea using the CEA Scale at 2 different time points at day 1. The overall inter-rater agreement for Kendall's W for all raters combined was estimated based on the average of the scores from those 2 different time points. The degree of agreement of the point estimates of Kendall's W was interpreted according to the reference range scale that was pre-defined as: ≤ 0=poor, 0.00-0.20=slight, 0.21-0.40=fair, 0.41-0.60=moderate, 0.61-0.80=substantial and 0.81-1.00=almost perfect. The 95% confidence interval for Kendall's W was provided.
Intra-rater Reliability of the CEA Scale
时间窗: Day 1
Intra-rater (within raters) agreement of the CEA scores (0=clear skin with no signs of erythema; 1=almost clear of erythema, slight redness; 2=mild erythema, definite redness; 3=moderate erythema, marked redness; 4=severe erythema, fiery redness) was evaluated by weighted Kappa statistics (WKS). WKS were calculated for each of 7 raters who evaluated 104 participant's severity of erythema of rosacea using the CEA scale, assessing agreement between 2 different time points at day 1. The overall intra-rater agreement for WKS for all raters combined was estimated by pooling WKS for each rater using a chi-square statistic. The degree of agreement of the point estimates of WKS was interpreted according to the reference range scale that was predefined as: ≤ 0=poor, 0.00-0.20=slight, 0.21-0.40=fair, 0.41-0.60=moderate, 0.61-0.80=substantial and 0.81-1.00=almost perfect. The 95% confidence interval for Kappa statistics was provided.
次要结局
未报告次要终点