PORTAS 2, Comparing Venae Sectio Versus Punction of Vena Subclavia for Insertion of a Totally Implantable Access Port
Not Applicable
Completed
- Conditions
- Cancer
- Registration Number
- NCT00600444
- Lead Sponsor
- Heidelberg University
- Brief Summary
The purpose of this trial is to investigate if the success rate of punction the vena subclavia (99% in retrospective studies) will be 15% higher than the success rate of venae sectio (80% in retro and prospective studies) for implantation of a totally implantable access ports.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 100
Inclusion Criteria
- Age equal or greater than 18 years
- Patients scheduled for primary elective implantation of TIAP
Exclusion Criteria
- Participation in another clinical trial which could interfere with the primary endpoint of this study
- Lack of compliance
- Impaired mental state or language problem
- Patients with known allergy to contrast agent
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Primary success rate of the randomized intervention Assessed on the day of surgery (day 0)
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Peri-/postoperative complication rate for the randomized intervention Assessed after 90 day post operation
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
University of Heidelberg
🇩🇪Heidelberg, Baden Würtemberg, Germany
University of Heidelberg🇩🇪Heidelberg, Baden Würtemberg, Germany