Printed Educational Materials (PEMs) and their impact on physician decision making towards more evidence based choices: a single centre randomised tria
试验速览
- 阶段
- 未知
- 状态
- 已完成
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 5,547
研究概览
简要总结
2007 Protocol article in http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18039362 process evaluation protocol 2007 Protocol article in http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18039361 protocol 2007 Protocol article in http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18039363 sub-trial protocol 2014 Results article in http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25098442 diabetic retinopathy results 2014 Results article in http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25098587 diabetic retinopathy results 2016 Results article in http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27619339 hypertension results 2016 Results article in http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27640126 hypertension results 2021 Results article in https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34895165/ (added 14/12/2021)
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
入排标准
- 性别
- All
入选标准
- •5547 actively practicing family (FP) and general practitioners (GP) in Ontario (~25 years and above, either sex) that have more than 100 patients over 65 years of age in fee for service practice with greater $50,000 billings to OHIP in 2003, randomised each time for three mail-outs of PEMs - the Printed Educational Materials
排除标准
- •Physicians who have elected not to receive 'informed', a newsletter on evidence based practice out of the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (ICES)
