MedPath

Subarachnoid Administrations of Adults Autologous Mesenchymal Stromal Cells in SCI

Phase 1
Completed
Conditions
Spinal Cord Injury
Interventions
Biological: Adult Autologous Mesenchymal Bone Marrow Cell
Registration Number
NCT02165904
Lead Sponsor
Puerta de Hierro University Hospital
Brief Summary

The study goes on 24 months, with recruiting, treatment and follow period for all patients. The first day for each patient will be the first cellular administration. 3 doses will be administrated every 3 months from first dose.

When the clinical trial finishes, it will be done a completed check of all obtained parameters.

Detailed Description

It is a clinical trial phase I, single center, non-randomized, uncontrolled, open prospective follow-up of a cohort of patients with chronic spinal cord injury (SCI) .10 patients will be included with this injury.

Primary objective: Analyze the possible clinical efficacy of administration of main adult mesenchymal autologous cells expanded "in vitro" in patients with incomplete and chronically established SCI.

Secondary objectives: Confirm the safety of treatment, and study possible changes in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) levels (Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF), nerve growth factor (NGF), ciliary neurotrophic factor (CNTF), Nerve Growth Factor 3 and 4(NT3 and NT4) after subarachnoid administration of BMMC.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
10
Inclusion Criteria
  1. Incomplete SCI
  2. Neurological deficit clinically stable at least 12 months prior to treatment, and with a minimum of one-year evolution after SCI.
  3. Neurophysiological confirmation of incomplete SCI.
  4. The MRI study that morphologically evaluate the SCI.
  5. Age between 18 and 70 years
  6. Thread Men and women will compromise to use anticonceptive issues from first cell´s extraction to 6 months after last cell´s administration.
  7. Ability to attend clinical follow-up and perform physical therapy through the treatment period.
  8. Written and signed informed consent, according to the local regulation.
  9. Hematologic and creatinin parameters, SGOT and SGPT, within the normal range, according to laboratory standards considering that small variations could be accepted based on clinical study team criteria.
Read More
Exclusion Criteria
  1. A classification in ASIA and FRANKEL clinical scales to evaluate the SCI.
  2. Neurophysiological records that confirm the complete SCI.
  3. Age below 18 years or above 70.
  4. Pregnancy or lactation.
  5. Malignancy disease diagnosed or treated within the last 5 years.
  6. Patients with systemic disease that represents and additional risk to treatment.
  7. Patients with uncertain commitment to follow the physical therapy and clinical visits as well as patient with a negative input in the previous phycological assessment.
  8. Inability to assess the SCI features through MRI either noise due to spinal stabilization systems or any other cause.
  9. Patients currently under hematopoietic growth factors treatment or who required or maintained anticoagulation.
  10. Neurodegenerative disease additional.
  11. History of substance abuse, psychiatric disease or allergy to the protein products used in the process of cell expansion.
  12. Positive serology for HIV and syphilis.
  13. Active Hepatitis B or Hepatitis C.
  14. With other reason that would consider the patient ineligible for cell therapy according to the investigators judgment.
Read More

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
SINGLE_GROUP
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Autologous Mesenchymal Bone Marrow CellAdult Autologous Mesenchymal Bone Marrow CellAll patients will be treated with the same treatment: Adult Autologous Mesenchymal Bone Marrow Cell
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Efficacy-Change in Barthel Scoremeasure before treatment (baseline visit), 3, 6,9 and 12 months after surgery

- Changes in Barthel score at the beginning, through and the end of the treatment.

Ranges score: 0 to 100. Being 0 total patient dependency and 100 total patient independence.

Efficacy-Urodynamic Studies Maximum Cystometric CapacityUrodynamic studies before surgery, and at 6 and 12 months after surgery (follow-up

Urodynamic studies in terms of Maximum cystometric capacity

Efficacy- Changes in Functional Independence Measure Scalemeasure before treatment (baseline visit), 3, 6,9 and 12 months after surgery

- Changes in Functional Independence Measure scale (NIF scale), score at the beginning, through and the end of the treatment.

Ranges score: 18 to 126. Being 18 total patient dependency and 126 total patient independence.

Efficacy-Changes in PENN Score.measure before treatment (baseline visit), 3, 6,9 and 12 months after surgery

- Changes in PENN score at the beginning, through and the end of the treatment

Ranges score: 0 to 4. Being 0 absence of spasms and 4 frequency greater than 10 spasms per hour.

Efficacy-IANC-SCIFRS ScaleChanges in IANC-SCIFRS scale before surgery (baseline visit) and 3, 6, 9, 12 months after surgery (follow-up period)

-Changes in IANC-SCIFRS scale

Ranges score: 0 to 48. Being 0 severe degree of disability and 48 normal value.

Efficacy-Sensivity Improvement Using the ASIA Scoremeasure before treatment (baseline visit), 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after surgery

Sensitivity improvement was measured using the ASIA (American Spinal Injury Association) scale to measure the Surface sensitivity (LTS), pain sensitivity (PPS), and the degree of motor function in key muscles (MS). The sum of MS, LTS, and PPS configure total ASIA score. A minimum possible score is 0 points. A maximum possible score is 224 points for a patient with normal sensation. ASIA score was obtained before surgery, and 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after surgery. Mean and standard deviation for the 10 patients were obtained at all the time points and statistically analyzed.

Efficacy-Changes in EVA Scoremeasure before treatment (baseline visit), 3, 6,9 and 12 months after surgery

• Changes in EVA score at the beginning, through and the end of the treatment

Ranges score: 0 to 10. Being 0 absence of pain and 10 the worst pain.

Changes in ASHWORTH Scoremeasure before treatment (baseline visit), 3, 6,9 and 12 months after surgery

- Changes in ASHWORTH score at the beginning, through and the end of the treatment

Ranges score: 0 to 4. Being 0 when there isn´t increase in muscle tone when stretching, and 4 when there is rigid affected follow-up in flexion or extension

Efficacy- Changes in Geffner ScoreChanges in Geffner scale before surgery (baseline visit) and 3, 6, 9, 12 months after surgery (follow-up period)

changes in Geffner score before surgery (baseline visit) and 3, 6, 9, 12 months after surgery (follow-up period)

Ranges score: 0 to 6. Being 0 absence of bladder control and 6 total control of bladder

Efficacy- Changes in NBD Scoremeasure before treatment (baseline visit), 3, 6,9 and 12 months after surgery

changes in NBD score before surgery (baseline visit) and 3, 6, 9, 12 months after surgery (follow-up period)

Ranges score: 0 to 47. 0-6 is very minor dysfunction. 7-9 is minor dysfunction. 10-13 is moderate dysfunction; and 14 or more is severe dysfunction.

Efficacy-Changes in the Neurophysiological Parameters (SSEPs, Somatosensory Evoked Potentials)Efficacy-measure before treatment (baseline visit), 6, and 12 months after surgery

Changes in the neurophysiological parameters (SSEPs, somatosensory evoked potentials) measured as the number of patients that improved along the study.

Efficacy-Urodynamic Studies Bladder Compliancemeasure before treatment (baseline visit), 6 and 12 months after surgery

Urodynamic studies in terms of Bladder compliance. Bladder compliance is the result of a mathematical calculation of volume responsible for 1 cm H2O pressure rise measured during a cystometric filling

. It gives an indication on how the different mechanisms in the bladder wall react on stretching.

It is obvious that compliance figures can vary widely in groups which makes it difficult to define limits of normality.

Efficacy-modification of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)before (baseline visit) and at 12 months

Number of patients with changes in morphology of injury compared with basal images

Efficacy-Urodynammic in Terms of Detrusor PressureUrodynamic studies before surgery, and at 6 and 12 months after surgery (follow-up

Urodynamic studies in terms of detrusor pressure (decrease on detrusor pressure is considered a clinical improvement)

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Number of Adverse Events .Up to 12 months

- The safety will be valued with number of adverse events related with administration of subarachnoid autologous Bone Marrow Expanded Mesenchymal Cells in Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury (SCI).

Efficacy- Expression of Neurotrophins in CSF (CerebroSpinal Fluid) SamplesBasal and 10 months after the administration

Changes in expression of neurotrophins in CSF (CerebroSpinal Fluid) samples obtained previously to first administration of cell therapy, and previously to the last administration, at month 10, in order to study the variability in the expression of neurotrophins along time. The mean+SD (standard deviation) at each time point was obtained. The tested neurotrophins were: BDNF.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Hospital Puerta de Hierro

🇪🇸

Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath