Comparison of the anaesthetic effects of 4% articaine hydrochloride and 2% lidocaine hydrochloride for maxillary molar extraction: A randomised trial

Not Applicable

Recruiting

• Conditions: Oral Health; Compairing two types of local anaesthetic agents on pain control during dental extractions.; Anaesthesia

• Registration Number: PACTR201802003023333
• Lead Sponsor: Dr Adigun Olufemi Ibraheem

Brief Summary

Not available

Detailed Description

Not available

Study Timeline

• Results First Posted: 1900-01-01
• Study Start: 2018-01-27
• Last Update Posted: 29 May 2023

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: Recruiting
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 14

Inclusion Criteria

1 Patients that require bilateral extraction of corresponding firm maxillary molar teeth.
Acute pulpitis
Chronic pulpitis.
Acute exacerbation of chronic apical periodontitis.
Pre-orthodontic extraction.
Chronic apical periodontitis.
2Patients that are between the ages of 18 and 40 years.
3Patients that require simple, intra-alveolar extraction only.
4 Consenting patients.
5 Fully erupted teeth.

Exclusion Criteria

1Presence of underlying systemic diseases such as hypertension, diabetes, blood dyscrasias etc.
2Non consenting patients.
3Extractions that end in root fracture.
4Impacted teeth.
5Presence of inflammatory conditions such as dentoalveolar abscess.
6Patients on medication that can interfere with local anaesthetic agents such as meperidine, phenytoin, quinidine and cimetidine.
7Chronic alcoholic patients

Study & Design

• Study Type: Interventional
• Study Design: Not specified