MedPath

Comparison of The Efficacy of Endoscopic versus Microscopic Myringoplasty(surgical techniques) in Management of ear drum Perforations: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Recruiting
Conditions
chronic suppurative otitis media tubotympanic type
Registration Number
CTRI/2017/08/009199
Lead Sponsor
Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research
Brief Summary

Comparision of the efficacy of endoscopic versus Microscopic Myringoplasty in the management of pars tensa perforations : A Randomised clinical trial.

Closure of tympanic membrane perforations in the pars tensa region in a case of CSOM tubo tympanic type disease is known as myringoplasty. Various advancements in this surgery are now available and here we compare 2 novel procedures done for the treatment of pars tensa perforations. Hearing outcomes after both types of surgery will be assessed as the primary outcome and graft uptake will be the secondary outcome of this study. Block randomization will be followed. Data collection will be done and patient will be followed up post operatively at 8 weeks and 3 months for hearing assessment and graft uptake.Unpaired t test will be used to compare hearing outcomes between both the groups.Graft uptake will be statistically assessed by the chi square test or fischers test. This study aims to show both the techniques used for pars tensa perforation repair and advantages and disadvantages of each.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
Open to Recruitment
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
108
Inclusion Criteria

All diagnosed cases of CSOM TTD with pars tensa perforation and conductive hearing loss in the age group of 18 to 50 years of both sex in JIPMER hospital.

Exclusion Criteria
  • Patients with active discharge from middle ear 2 CSOM of attico antral type 3.
  • Patients with otitis externa 4.
  • Patients with sensorineural hearing loss or mixed type hearing loss 5 Patients with abnormalities in ossicular chain 6 Patients with nasal allergy, bleeding diathesis, diabetes, hypertension.

Study & Design

Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Not specified
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
To compare hearing outcome in both the groups in the treatment of CSOM TTDPre operative | 8 weeks | 3 months
Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
To compare graft uptake between both the groups8 weeks

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

JIPMER

🇮🇳

Pondicherry, PONDICHERRY, India

JIPMER
🇮🇳Pondicherry, PONDICHERRY, India
R Chandra Shekar Reddy
Principal investigator
9989303942
dr.rcsreddy91@gmail.com

MedPath

Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.

© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.