A Prospective, Randomized Study Comparing Cemented and Non-cemented Semiendoprostheses in the Treatment of Proximal Femoral Fractures in the Elderly Patients
Overview
- Phase
- N/A
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Hip Fracture
- Sponsor
- Kuopio University Hospital
- Enrollment
- 400
- Locations
- 2
- Primary Endpoint
- Primary mortality
- Last Updated
- 11 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
The hip semiendoprosthesis is an acceptable method to treat the proximal femoral fractures. Traditionally, the cemented version of the semiendoprosthesis has been used for this indication. However, the cementing carries a risk of fat embolism during the pressurization of the cement. The fat embolism can be avoided when using the non-cemented semiendoprosthesis. In this study we want to find out whether there are any differences in the treatment results between the cemented and non-cemented semiendoprostheses when treating the proximal femoral fractures.
Investigators
Tero Yli-Kyyny
M.D.
Kuopio University Hospital
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •A proximal femoral fracture
Exclusion Criteria
- •Rheumatoid arthritis
- •Pathologic fracture
- •Severe dementia (preventing the informed consent)
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Primary mortality
Time Frame: 3 months
Secondary Outcomes
- Prosthetic complications(1 year)