跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT04548661
NCT04548661已完成不适用

CLinical Evaluation of Adults UNdergoing Elective Surgery Utilizing Intraoperative Incisional Wound Irrigation: A Randomized Controlled Trial (CLEAN Wound)

Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre23 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 2,701 人开始时间: 2023年8月2日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
2,701
试验地点
23
主要终点
Incidence of incisional surgical site infection (SSI)

研究概览

简要总结

A surgical site infection (SSI) is an infection that occurs after a surgical procedure. Despite a variety of infection prevention strategies, SSIs still occur often and impose a significant burden on patients and the healthcare system. Intraoperative irrigation (or washing of the surgical incision before closure) may reduce SSIs, but this is uncertain.

The Clinical Evaluation of Adults Undergoing Elective Surgery Utilizing Intraoperative Incisional Wound Irrigation (CLEAN Wound) trial aims to determine if incisional wound irrigation with an antiseptic or salt water solution can reduce SSIs within 30 days of surgery compared to no wound irrigation. 2,500 patients aged 18 years or older who are planned to undergo an abdominal or groin open or laparoscopic procedure will be randomly assigned to incisional wound irrigation with povidone-iodine solution; or incisional wound irrigation with saline; or no irrigation and followed for 30 days after surgery to assess the incidence of SSIs, with additional outcomes collected up to 90 days after surgery.

Even with significant advances in medicine over the past decades, there are still many fundamental issues in perioperative care that remain unclear due to lack of evidence. If this trial were to demonstrate that intraoperative wound irrigation reduces the incidence of SSI, these practice-changing findings could greatly benefit patients worldwide.

详细描述

Background/Rationale: Recent international guidelines and reviews have highlighted that studies of intraoperative irrigation were conducted in small samples over 30 years ago and no longer reflect the standard of care, judging the evidence to be of very low to moderate quality, and have called for additional RCTs. For example, as per the WHO Guidelines, RCTs are needed to assess frequently utilized irrigation solutions and their effect on SSI risk and state that a suitable alternative to povidone-iodine is currently unknown. Furthermore, determining whether irrigation with antiseptics and antibiotics can reduce SSIs was listed as a key research recommendation by NICE, in addition to determining cost-effectiveness of the intervention. Additional evidence is therefore required to support or refute the effectiveness of intraoperative irrigation in reducing SSIs and to address practice heterogeneity, with a focus on establishing whether irrigation is needed, and if so, which solution should be used.

Objectives: The primary objective is to determine if intraoperative incisional wound irrigation with povidone-iodine or saline in participants undergoing surgery can reduce incisional SSIs within 30 days of surgery compared to no irrigation. The secondary outcomes include: quality of life (QoL), proportion of participants prescribed systemic antibiotics, wound care received via home care services (all within 30 days of surgery); length of stay (LOS) during index hospitalization; wound dehiscence requiring reoperation, postoperative complications, mortality and healthcare utilization (all within 90 days of surgery), including: number of re-interventions (i.e. radiologically guided drain insertion or revision); number of all-cause reoperations; number of all-cause emergency department visits; number of all-cause family physician or walk-in clinic visits; and number of all-cause readmissions and length of stay of each readmission.

Study Design: This is a multicentre, pragmatic, participant and adjudicator-blinded, three-arm RCT. Participants will be randomized using an adaptive design to incisional wound irrigation with povidone-iodine versus incisional wound irrigation with saline versus no irrigation and will be followed until 30 days after surgery to assess the incidence of SSIs, with additional outcomes collected up to 90 days after surgery. The trial is adaptive, in that one of the arms may be discontinued as the trial progresses if it reaches a threshold for inferiority, and will be a continuation of our pilot trial (i.e., a vanguard design).

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Prevention
盲法
Double (Participant, Outcomes Assessor)

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者
否

入选标准

  • •All participants must meet all of the following inclusion criteria to participate in this study:
  • •Aged 18 years or older;
  • •Ontario Health Insurance Plan (OHIP) holder (for Ontario sites)
  • •And planned to undergo any one of the following surgical procedures:
  • •a) Laparotomy, CDC Class II (clean-contaminated) or III (contaminated) incision b) Laparoscopy with a planned extraction site ≥3 cm, CDC Class II (clean-contaminated) or III (contaminated) incision c) Groin incision for open or hybrid arterial procedure
  • •All participants meeting any of the following

排除标准

  • •at baseline will be excluded from participation in this study:
  • •Contraindication to receiving povidone-iodine irrigation (i.e., known allergy)
  • •Any active skin or soft tissue infection (at any site, including gangrene)
  • •Known or anticipated CDC Class IV (Dirty) incision

研究组 & 干预措施

Povidone-iodine solution

Experimental

干预措施: Intraoperative incisional wound irrigation with povidone-iodine solution (Procedure)

Saline

Placebo Comparator

干预措施: Intraoperative incisional wound irrigation with saline (Procedure)

No irrigation

No Intervention

Standard incision management

结局指标

主要结局

Incidence of incisional surgical site infection (SSI)

时间窗: Within 30 days of surgery

SSI will be captured through blinded central review of postoperative healthcare records and participants' self-report (using a patient-reported outcome measure, or PROM). Participants will be considered to have a SSI if they meet either the health record review criteria (if any of the following occurred: 1) wound was opened and packed; 2) wound-specific treatment with antibiotics; or 3) a diagnosis of SSI explicitly recorded in medical record by treating clinician) OR PROM criteria \[(i.e., if participant answers "Yes" to questions 2, 3 or 4: Have your surgical incision(s) been opened and packed (with gauze or bandages inside the wound) by a physician, physician assistant, nurse or nurse practitioner?; Have you been prescribed antibiotics for a problem with your surgical incision(s)?; Have you been told that your surgical incision(s) are infected by a physician, physician assistant, nurse or nurse practitioner?)\]

次要结局

  • Proportion of participants with postoperative complications(within 90 days of surgery)
  • EQ-5D-5L Quality of life(within 30 days of surgery)
  • Proportion of participants requiring wound care (received via home care services)(within 30 days of surgery)
  • Length of stay (LOS) (in days)(during hospitalization (up to day 30))
  • Mortality(within 90 days of surgery)
  • Proportion of participants with wound dehiscence requiring reoperation(within 90 days of surgery)
  • Proportion of participants prescribed systemic antibiotics(within 30 days of surgery)
  • Healthcare utilization(within 90 days of surgery)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Dr. Paul Karanicolas

Scientist

Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre

研究点 (23)

Loading locations...

相似试验