Effects of Strength Exercise on Fall Risk in Elderly With Alzheimer's Disease
- Conditions
- Fall RiskAlzheimer DiseaseDementia; Alzheimer's Type (Etiology)ElderlyResistance Training
- Interventions
- Procedure: Strength exerciseOther: Usual treatment
- Registration Number
- NCT04981587
- Lead Sponsor
- University of Jaén
- Brief Summary
Interventional study to show the effects of strength exercise on fall risk in elderly with Alzheimer's disease
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 64
- accept to participate in the study, through informed consent
- subjects aged 60 or over with medical diagnosis of Azlheimer´s disease
- minimal physical and mental state to perform the cognitive tests and strength exercise routine
- Neurodegenerative disease other than Alzheimer's disease
- Suffering from serious somatic or psychiatric illnesses
- Patients who have practiced strength exercise regularly
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Intervention group Strength exercise This is the group that receives strength exercise in addition to usual treatment Intervention group Usual treatment This is the group that receives strength exercise in addition to usual treatment Control group Usual treatment This is the group that only receives usual treatment
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Change from baseline Short physical performance battery (SPPB) at 3 and 6 months Baseline, 3 and 6 months (3 months after intervention) Informs about fall risk and mobility Score: 0-12 High score means better result
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Change from baseline Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) at 3 and 6 months Baseline, 3 and 6 months (3 months after intervention) This test gives us information about the cognitive performance of the participants Score: 0-30 High score means better result
Change from baseline FRAIL test at 3 and 6 months Baseline, 3 and 6 months (3 months after intervention) This rapid test allows to determine the state of frailty of older people Score: 0-5 High score means worst result
Change from baseline One Maximum repetition strength test (1 MR) at 1,2,3 and 6 months Baseline, 1 , 2 , 3 and 6 months (3 months after intervention) Allows you easily to assess maximum strength Score: 0-∞ High score means more strength level
Change from baseline Lawton Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale (IADL) at 3 and 6 months Baseline, 3 and 6 months (3 months after intervention) This tool gives us information about performance in activities of daily living Score: 0-8 High score means better result
Change from baseline Quality of life Alzheimer Disease (QoL-AD) at 3 and 6 months Baseline, 3 and 6 months (3 months after intervention) Through this test we can know the level of quality of life of users who suffer from this disease Score: 0-52 High score means better result
Change from baseline Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI-Q) at 3 and 6 months Baseline, 3 and 6 months (3 months after intervention) This tool allows to specify the neuropsychiatric symptoms patients present Score: 0-36 High score means worst result
Change from baseline Activities specific balance confidence scale (ABC scale) at 3 and 6 months Baseline, 3 and 6 months (3 months after intervention) This questionnaire allows to measure the balance of a person Score: 0-100% High percentage means better result
Change from baseline Manual dynamometry at 1,2,3 and 6 months Baseline, 1, 2, 3 and 6 months (3 months after intervention) This test allows to quantify force an individual presents in a simple way Score: 0-∞ High score means better result
Modified Borg scale 3 times/week during strength exercises sessions In this way we can measure the level of perceived exertion during the intervention with strength exercise Score: 0-10 High score means more fatigue
Trial Locations
- Locations (2)
Alexander achalandabaso
🇪🇸Alcalá De Henares, Madrid, Spain
A.F.A La Estrella
🇪🇸Jaén, Andalucía, Spain