Esthetic Zone Socket Shield Technique With Immediate Temporization vs. Conventional Immediate Implant Placement With Immediate Temporization Randomized Clinical Trial

Cairo University1 site in 1 country12 target enrollmentMay 15, 2019

ConditionsPreservation of the Labial Bone

Overview

Phase: Not Applicable
Intervention: Not specified
Conditions: Preservation of the Labial Bone
Sponsor: Cairo University
Enrollment: 12
Locations: 1
Primary Endpoint: implant stability
Last Updated: 7 years ago

Overview Investigators Eligibility Criteria Outcomes Sites Similar Trials

Overview

Brief Summary

eighteen implants will be placed in patients with non-restorable maxillary teeth in the aesthetic area.the recruited patients will be divided into two groups .group 1 will undergo socket shield technique with immediate temporization ,while group 2 will undergo conventional immediate implant placement with immediate temporization. to compare bone loss and aesthetic outcomes in the two techniques.

Registry

clinicaltrials.gov

Start Date

May 15, 2019

End Date

December 2019

Last Updated

7 years ago

Study Type

Interventional

Study Design

Parallel

Sex

All

Investigators

Sponsor

Cairo University

Responsible Party

Principal Investigator

Ahmed Abd El Rahman

principle investigator

Cairo University

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

•Patients with non-restorable maxillary anterior teeth in the esthetic zone indicated for implant placement.
•Both sexes.
•No intraoral soft and hard tissue pathology
•No systemic condition that contraindicate implant placement

Exclusion Criteria

•Heavy smokers more than 20 cigarettes per day.
•Patients with systemic disease that may affect normal healing.
•Psychiatric problems
•Disorders to implant are related to history of radiation therapy to the head and neck neoplasia