跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT03587597
NCT03587597Unknown不适用

Esthetic Zone Socket Shield Technique With Immediate Temporization vs. Conventional Immediate Implant Placement With Immediate Temporization Randomized Clinical Trial

Cairo University1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 12 人开始时间: 2019年5月15日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
入组人数
12
试验地点
1
主要终点
implant stability

研究概览

简要总结

eighteen implants will be placed in patients with non-restorable maxillary teeth in the aesthetic area.the recruited patients will be divided into two groups .group 1 will undergo socket shield technique with immediate temporization ,while group 2 will undergo conventional immediate implant placement with immediate temporization. to compare bone loss and aesthetic outcomes in the two techniques.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Prevention
盲法
Single (Participant)

入排标准

年龄范围
25 Years 至 40 Years(Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Patients with non-restorable maxillary anterior teeth in the esthetic zone indicated for implant placement.
  • Both sexes.
  • No intraoral soft and hard tissue pathology
  • No systemic condition that contraindicate implant placement

排除标准

  • Heavy smokers more than 20 cigarettes per day.
  • Patients with systemic disease that may affect normal healing.
  • Psychiatric problems
  • Disorders to implant are related to history of radiation therapy to the head and neck neoplasia

结局指标

主要结局

implant stability

时间窗: immediately after implant placement

implant stability will be measured using osstell device

次要结局

  • Amount of bone loss(after 3 month from implant insertion.)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Ahmed Abd El Rahman

principle investigator

Cairo University

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验

Socket Shield vs Conventional Immediate Implant | 临床试验