MedPath

Do the Health Education Materials Developed in the Gynecology and Diseases Nursing Course Affect Students' Teaching Material Motivation and Material Design Self-Efficacy Beliefs?

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Nursing Caries
Interventions
Behavioral: Education
Registration Number
NCT06389929
Lead Sponsor
Inonu University
Brief Summary

Purpose: This study aimed to examine the effect of health education material developed by nursing students in gynecological health and disease nursing on students' teaching material motivation and material design self-efficacy belief.

Method: The study was conducted as a prospective randomized controlled study. n=86 (43=control, 43=intervention) students who took the Women's Health and Diseases Nursing course at Bartın University Faculty of Health Sciences Nursing Department between 30.10.2023-20.01.2024 and volunteered to participate in the study were randomized. It was conducted in two groups: intervention and control.In the research, data will be collected with the Data Collection Form prepared by reviewing the literature, Instructional Material Motivation Scale and Material Design Self-Efficacy Belief Scale. Descriptive statistics, Student t-test, Mann-Whitney U Test, Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test and Pearson correlation tests will be used to evaluate the data.

Detailed Description

Aim: This study aimed to examine the effect of health education material developed by nursing students in women's health and disease nursing on students' teaching material motivation and material design self-efficacy beliefs.

Method: The study was conducted as a prospective randomized controlled study. n=86 (43=control, 43=intervention) students who took the Women's Health and Diseases Nursing course at Bartın University Faculty of Health Sciences Nursing Department between 30.10.2023-20.01.2024 and volunteered to participate in the study were randomized. It was conducted in two groups: intervention and control. In the research, data will be collected with the Data Collection Form prepared by reviewing the literature, Instructional Material Motivation Scale and Material Design Self-Efficacy Belief Scale. Descriptive statistics, Student t-test, Mann-Whitney U Test, Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test and Pearson correlation tests will be used to evaluate the data.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
92
Inclusion Criteria
  • Students who were over 18 years old,
  • Students who spoke Turkish,
  • Students who were not diagnosed with hearing impairment,
  • Students who took the Gynecology and Diseases Nursing course,
  • Students who had written consent
  • Students who volunteered to participate
Exclusion Criteria
  • Not studying at Bartın University,
  • students who did not take the Gynecology and Diseases Nursing course

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Skill GroupEducationStudents in the skill group will take one of the applications in the Skill Checklists (Breastfeeding Education Skill Check Form, Breast Care and Caregiving to Mothers with Breast Engorgement Skill Check Form, Breast Self-Examination (KKMM) Training Skill Check Form) within the scope of the "Women's Health and Diseases Nursing Course". Health education material was prepared in line with the skills they determined. The duration of training material preparation is determined as 1 week for each student. The health education material developed was prepared and presented by evaluating the reason, importance, awareness aspect and innovative perspective of the determined skill.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Instructional Material Motivation Scaletwo weeks

The original version of the scale was published by Keller (2010). PMSQ, a 36-item measurement tool consisting of five-point Likert type options (not true, somewhat true, true, moderately true, very true), was developed by taking the ARCS Model as a criterion. The measurement tool consists of four sub-dimensions with the same name as the compliance, trust, satisfaction and attention components of the ARCS Model. The 3rd, 7th, 12th, 15th, 19th, 22nd, 29th, 31st and 34th items of the measurement tool have negative expressions and require reverse scoring. The lowest score that can be obtained from the measurement tool, whose midpoint is 108.00, is 36.00, while the highest score is 180.00 (Keller, 2010).

Increasing scores from the scale indicate an increase in motivation. The original version of the scale was applied to university students by Keller (2006), and as a result of the analyzes made for the sub-dimensions of the measurement tool.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Material Design Self-Efficacy Belief Scaletwo weeks

In order to determine material design self-efficacy beliefs, the Material Design Self-Efficacy Belief Scale developed by Bakaç and Özen (2015) was used. The validity and reliability study of the scale was conducted on 300 teacher candidates who studied at Abant İzzet Baysal University in the 2013-2014 academic year and had previously taken the ÖTMT course. The construct validity of the scale was tested by exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, and a scale with three dimensions (Material Preparation on Computer, Three-Dimensional Material Design and Two-Dimensional Material Design) and 25 items was created, explaining 48% of the total variance. The scale items are 5-point Likert type and are as follows: "Strongly Disagree", "Disagree", Undecided", Agree" and "Strongly Agree".

Increasing scores from the scale indicate an increase in motivation.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Simge OZTURK

🇹🇷

Bartin, None Selected, Turkey

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath