Electrophysiologic and Morphologic Assessment of the Substrate to Guide Implantation of Defibrillators in Dilated Cardiomyopathy

Catholic University of the Sacred Heart3 sites in 2 countries200 target enrollmentNovember 2009

ConditionsDilated Cardiomyopathy Primary Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator

Overview

Phase: Not Applicable
Intervention: Not specified
Conditions: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Sponsor: Catholic University of the Sacred Heart
Enrollment: 200
Locations: 3
Primary Endpoint: Arrhythmic Event
Last Updated: 14 years ago

Overview Investigators Eligibility Criteria Outcomes Sites Similar Trials

Overview

Brief Summary

With the present study the investigators intend to identify the morphologic and electrophysiologic substrate markers of increased arrhythmic risk in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy undergoing implantation of a defibrillator for the primary prevention of sudden cardiac death. Moreover, the investigators also aim to identify if there is any electrophysiological substrate modification at the time of the first arrhythmic event in these patients. To this aim, the investigators will prospectively correlate electroanatomic mapping and cardiac magnetic resonance findings with arrhythmic events, in order to identify substrate markers of increased arrhythmic risk in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy, who are therefore more likely to benefit from a defibrillator implantation. Furthermore, electroanatomic mapping will be repeated at the time of the first arrhythmic event and compared with that at baseline, in order to evaluate any electrophysiological substrate changes.

Detailed Description

A correct identification of patients at high risk of sudden cardiac death is crucial for a rational clinical management, since the demonstrated effectiveness of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators on the reduction of sudden cardiac death. Basing on the results of multiple clinical trials, left ventricular systolic function, measured as ejection fraction, is currently the only recommended tool to identify patients at higher risk of sudden death that would benefit from a prophylactic defibrillator. However, the systematic implementation of current recommendations results in a substantial number of inappropriate defibrillator implantations, while failing to prevent the majority of sudden deaths occurring in the general population. Unfortunately, at present time we have no other way to identify patients at higher risk of sudden cardiac death, since other proposed risk markers have not been consistently demonstrated of incremental value. Recent data suggest that several substrate markers, either assessed morphologically with magnetic resonance imaging, or electrophysiologically with invasive mapping procedures, may be helpful to identify subgroup of patients at higher arrhythmic risk. However, previous studies have been largely conducted on few patients, most were retrospective or with short follow-up. We will submit patients with dilated cardiomyopathy undergoing implant of an implantable cardioverter defibrillator to a morphologic and electrophysiologic substrate evaluation including cardiac magnetic resonance with gadolinium contrast-enhancement study, and electroanatomic mapping with bipolar electrogram voltage and morphological analysis. The electroanatomic mapping and cardiac magnetic resonance will be repeated at the time of the first arrhythmic event. We expect to define the role of anatomical and electrophysiological substrate abnormalities in determining malignant ventricular arrhythmias in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy, thus allowing a better risk stratification and prevention of sudden death.

Registry

clinicaltrials.gov

Start Date

November 2009

End Date

TBD

Last Updated

14 years ago

Study Type

Observational

Sex

All

Investigators

Sponsor

Catholic University of the Sacred Heart

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

•Males and females ≥18 year-old with full capacity.
•A New York Heart Association (NYHA) class II or III chronic, stable congestive heart failure (CHF).
•A left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of no more than 35 percent.

Exclusion Criteria

•Age \<18 years or diminished capacity.
•Patients with LVEF ≥ 35% or asymptomatic left ventricular dysfunction.
•Patients with NYHA class IV CHF.
•Patients with history of ventricular arrhythmias causing pre-syncope or syncope, cardiac arrest or a spontaneous episode of sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) (≥30 seconds at rates of \>100 bpm), unless these occurred within 48 hours of a myocardial infarction.
•Females who are pregnant or have childbearing potential and are not using reliable methods of contraception.
•Patients with history of restrictive, infiltrative, or hypertrophic cardiomyopathy; arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy; constrictive pericarditis; congenital heart disease; surgically correctable valvular disease; and/or inoperable obstructive valvular disease.
•Patients with reversible nonischemic cardiomyopathy such as acute viral myocarditis, alcohol-induced cardiomyopathy, peripartum cardiomyopathy, Takotsubo cardiomyopathy.
•Patients with mechanical or biologic prosthetic cardiac valves.
•Patients with history of a major psychiatric disorder, active alcohol/drug abuse, or noncompliance.
•Coronary artery bypass graft surgery or percutaneous coronary intervention (balloon and/or stent angioplasty) within the past 90 days prior to enrollment.

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Arrhythmic Event

Time Frame: 2 years

ICD shock on rapid sustained ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation or effective antitachycardia pacing.

Change in Arrhythmogenic Substrate

Time Frame: 2 years

Change in the arrhythmogenic substrate in patients who will experience an arrhythmic event compared to a matched control group who will remain free from arrhythmic event.