PET/CT Whole-body Dynamic Acquisition at FDG to Metastatic Melanoma Under Immunotherapy
Recruiting
- Conditions
- Metastatic Melanoma
- Registration Number
- NCT04272658
- Lead Sponsor
- University Hospital, Brest
- Brief Summary
The value of 4D body-to-whole dynamic acquisition in FDG PET / CT to differentiate progression / pseudo-progression during the first therapeutic assessment (PET1) of metastatic melanoma treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI)to predict the progression of the disease..
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 56
Inclusion Criteria
- Patient old ≥ 18 years
- With metastatic melanoma
- Treated with anti-PD1 : Nivolumab or Pembrolizumab or Combo IPI-Nivo
- Having formulated a non-opposition
Exclusion Criteria
-
- Minor patient < 18 years
- Pregnancy or breastfeeding
- Other type of tumor than metastatic melanoma
- Non-eligibility for the examination
- Refusal of participation
Study & Design
- Study Type
- OBSERVATIONAL
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Values of the Ki absorption coefficient resulting from a FDG PET / CT full-body 4D dynamic acquisition to differentiate the pseudo-progression / progression of metastatic melanoma treated with ICI 5 years
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Correlation between the Ki lesional values resulting from the 4D acquisition of the PET / CT from PET1 and PET0 the biological parameters (LDH, leucocytes, neutrophils) to differentiate pseudo-progression / progression 5 years Correlation between the Ki lesion values derived from PET1 and the quantitative parameters resulting from PET0 histological specifications of the tumors (% PD-L1, T-CD8 infiltration, PTEN status) to differentiate pseudo-progression / progression. 5 years Correlation between the Ki lesion values resulting from the 4D acquisition of FDG PET / CT for PET1 and the quantitative parameters resulting from PET0 to differentiate pseudo-progression / progression 5 years Correlation between lesional Ki values resulting from the 4D acquisition of FDG PET / CT for from PET1 and the quantitative parameters resulting from PET0 ICI- related adverse effect to differentiate pseudo-progression / progression 5 years
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.
What molecular mechanisms underlie pseudo-progression in metastatic melanoma during ICI therapy as detected by FDG PET/CT dynamic acquisition?
How does 4D FDG PET/CT dynamic acquisition compare to standard static PET/CT in predicting progression of metastatic melanoma under immunotherapy?
Which biomarkers correlate with pseudo-progression versus true progression in NCT04272658 melanoma immunotherapy trial?
What adverse events are associated with FDG PET/CT dynamic acquisition in metastatic melanoma patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors?
Are there combination approaches involving immune checkpoint inhibitors and FDG PET/CT that improve outcome prediction for BRAF wild-type metastatic melanoma?
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Hospital University ff Brest
🇫🇷Brest, Finistere, France
Hospital University ff Brest🇫🇷Brest, Finistere, FranceRonan ABGRAL, MD-PhDContact