Efficacy and Safety of Verteporfin Added to Ranibizumab in the Treatment of Symptomatic Macular Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy
- Conditions
- Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy
- Interventions
- Registration Number
- NCT00674323
- Lead Sponsor
- Novartis
- Brief Summary
This study aims to compare the efficacy of ranibizumab and verteporfin PDT combination treatment and verteporfin PDT monotherapy vs.ranibizumab monotherapy alone in achieving complete regression of polyps in patients with symptomatic macular polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 61
- Patients must give written informed consent before any assessment is performed.
- Male or Female patients ≥18 yrs of age
- Patients willing and able to comply with all study procedures
Inclusion criteria for study eye:
- BCVA letter score between 73-24 (approximately 20/40 to 20/320 Snellen equivalent) using ETDRS visual acuity chart measured at 4 meters
- PCV diagnosis confirmed by Central Reading Center
- Greatest Linear Dimension (GLD) of the total lesion area < 5400 µm (~9 Macular Photocoagulation Study Disc Areas)
- Women of child-bearing potential who are not using one or more reliable contraception methods
- Pregnant or nursing (lactating) women
- History of hypersensitivity or allergy to fluorescein or indocyanine green (ICG), clinically significant drug allergy or known hypersensitivity to therapeutic or diagnostic protein products, or to any of the study drugs or their components
- Patient with history of porphyria
- Systemic medications known to be toxic to the lens, retina, or optic nerve
- History of which might affect the interpretation of the results of the study, or renders the patient at high risk from treatment complications
- Use of other investigational drugs within 30 days of randomization
Exclusion criteria for study eye:
- Concomitant conditions/diseases:
- Presence of angioid streaks, macular fibrosis, presumed ocular histoplasmosis syndrome, pathologic myopia (-8 Diopters or more)
- Active ocular inflammation or infection
- Uncontrolled glaucoma
- Ocular disorders that may confound interpretation of study results
Prior Ocular treatment:
- Prior Verteporfin PDT, external-beam radiation, laser photocoagulation, macular surgery, or transpupillary thermotherapy
- Prior local treatment with Pegaptanib, Ranibizumab, Bevacizumab or other anti-angiogenic compound or any investigational treatment in both eyes or systemic use of bevacizumab within 90 days prior to randomization
- History of intraocular surgery including pars plana vitrectomy and intraocular hemorrhage displacement is not allowed with the exception of uncomplicated cataract surgery that is allowed within 60 days prior to screening
- Ocular conditions that required chronic concomitant therapy within 90 days prior to randomization with topical, ocular, or systemically administered corticosteroids or any herbal medication known to contain steroid-like components
Other protocol-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria may apply
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Verteporfin and Ranibizumab Verteporfin Photodynamic Therapy Photodynamic therapy with verteporfin in combination with ranibizumab injection. Patients received one treatment at baseline with verteporfin photodynamic therapy (PDT) in the study eye and thereafter based on re-treatment criteria at intervals of at least 90 days. Within 1-24 hours, patients also received Ranibizumab intravitreal injection on Day 1 and at Month 1 and 2 and thereafter according to the re-treatment criteria at intervals of at least 30 days through Day 150. From month 3 onward, re-treatments were determined based on study-specific re-treatment criteria that included evaluation of polyp progression on indocyanine green angiography (ICGA), and assessment of fluorescein angiograms and visual acuity. Verteporfin and Ranibizumab Ranibizumab Photodynamic therapy with verteporfin in combination with ranibizumab injection. Patients received one treatment at baseline with verteporfin photodynamic therapy (PDT) in the study eye and thereafter based on re-treatment criteria at intervals of at least 90 days. Within 1-24 hours, patients also received Ranibizumab intravitreal injection on Day 1 and at Month 1 and 2 and thereafter according to the re-treatment criteria at intervals of at least 30 days through Day 150. From month 3 onward, re-treatments were determined based on study-specific re-treatment criteria that included evaluation of polyp progression on indocyanine green angiography (ICGA), and assessment of fluorescein angiograms and visual acuity. Verteporfin monotherapy Verteporfin Photodynamic Therapy Patients received one treatment at baseline with verteporfin photodynamic therapy in the study eye and thereafter based on re-treatment criteria at intervals of at least 90 days. Within 1-24 hours, patients also received Ranibizumab placebo (sham intravitreal injection) on Day 1 and at Month 1 and 2 and thereafter according to the re-treatment criteria at intervals of at least 30 days through Day 150. From month 3 onward, re-treatments were determined based on study-specific re-treatment criteria that included evaluation of polyp progression on indocyanine green angiography (ICGA), and assessment of fluorescein angiograms and visual acuity. Ranibizumab monotherapy Ranibizumab Patients received one treatment at baseline with verteporfin placebo (with sham photodynamic therapy) in the study eye and thereafter based on re-treatment criteria at intervals of at least 90 days. Within 1-24 hours, patients also received Ranibizumab intravitreal injection on Day 1 and at Month 1 and 2 and thereafter according to the re-treatment criteria at intervals of at least 30 days through Day 150. From month 3 onward, re-treatments were determined based on study-specific re-treatment criteria that included evaluation of polyp progression on indocyanine green angiography (ICGA), and assessment of fluorescein angiograms and visual acuity.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Number of Participants With Complete Regression (CR) of Polyps Measured by Indocyanine Green Angiography (ICGA) Month 6 Indocyanine green angiography (ICGA) assessments were performed using the Heidelberg Retinal Angiography 2 (HRA2) machine to measure the Total Lesion Area and the degree of polyp regression. Complete regression was defined as no polyps seen on the imaging.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Number of Participants With at Least One Complete Polyp Regression During 6 Months Assessed by ICGA Baseline through end of study (6 months) Indocyanine green angiography (ICGA) assessments were performed using the Heidelberg Retinal Angiography 2 (HRA2) machine to measure the Total Lesion Area and the degree of polyp regression. Complete regression was defined as no polyps seen on the imaging.
Mean Change From Baseline in Central Retinal Thickness Measured by Optic Coherence Tomography (OCT) Baseline and Month 6 High resolution 6 meridian scans were performed to measure central retinal thickness.
Mean Change From Baseline in Best-corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) of the Study Eye at Month 6 Baseline and Month 6 BCVA score was based on the number of letters read correctly on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) visual acuity chart assessed at a starting distance of 4 meters. An ETDRS visual acuity score of 85 is approximately 20/20. An increase in the VA score indicates improvement in visual acuity.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Novartis Investigative Site
🇹🇭Bangkok, Thailand