Dexmedetomidine Versus Pentobarbital Sedation Protocol for Non-painful Procedural Sedation in Pediatrics
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 撤回
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- failure of sedation
研究概览
简要总结
The investigators believe dexmedetomidine will provide superior sedation with reduced side effects and reduced time to discharge compared with pentobarbital. The investigators have developed sedation protocols with pentobarbital and dexmedetomidine in our ambulatory procedure center. These protocols are both routinely used for sedation in our unit. The investigators propose to study these two protocols in children ages 6 months to 6 years presenting to the ambulatory procedure center for non-painful procedural sedation. The investigators will compare failure of sedation, side effect profile, recovery and discharge times between the two pharmacologic protocols.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Other
- 盲法
- Single (Participant)
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 6 Months 至 6 Years（Child）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •Requiring sedation for non-painful procedures
- •Normal airway per exam
排除标准
- •Congenital syndromes with known difficult airways
- •Known difficult airway during past anesthesia or sedation experience
- •Parent/guardian refusal of participation
研究组 & 干预措施
1
Dexmedetomidine sedation protocol
干预措施: dexmedetomidine sedation protocol (Drug)
2
Pentobarbital sedation protocol
干预措施: pentobarbital sedation protocol (Drug)
结局指标
主要结局
failure of sedation
时间窗: day of sedation
次要结局
- side effect profile(48 hours)
- post-sedation recovery and discharge time(day of sedation)