Comparison of the accuracy of various digital scanners on ceramic milled crowns using the silicone replica method. A Clinical Trial.
Overview
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Status
- Not yet recruiting
- Sponsor
- Sashwat Sathish
- Enrollment
- 17
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- To compare the accuracy of CEREC Primescan and 3Shape TRIOS using the silicone replica technique to measure the bi-planar fit at 20 points for milled ceramic crowns.
Overview
Brief Summary
Aim:
To compare the clinical accuracy of Primescan Intra Oral Scanner and 3Shape TRIOS post milling via silicone replica method
Null Hypothesis:
There is no difference in accuracy between the intra-oral scanners 3Shape TRIOS and Primescan.
Alternate Hypothesis:
There is a difference in accuracy between the intra-oral scanners 3Shape TRIOS and Primescan.
Study Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Allocation
- Na
- Masking
- None
Eligibility Criteria
- Ages
- 18.00 Year(s) to 80.00 Year(s) (—)
- Sex
- All
Inclusion Criteria
- •Presence of adjacent and opposing teeth Age – 18 years and above RCT treated teeth Tessera milling as standard.
Exclusion Criteria
- •Absence of adjacent and opposing teeth.
- •Unrestorable teeth.
- •Patient with limited mouth opening and TMJ issued.
- •Lower incisors.
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
To compare the accuracy of CEREC Primescan and 3Shape TRIOS using the silicone replica technique to measure the bi-planar fit at 20 points for milled ceramic crowns.
Time Frame: Nil | No follow up
Secondary Outcomes
- Time taken for scanning to be done & time taken to design the crown will be recorded(Nil)
Investigators
Sashwat Sathish
Saveetha Denatal College and Hospital, Saveetha Institute of medical and technical sciences