â??Comparison of two airway devices placed above the voice box under vision guidance for the purpose of administrating anesthesia
Not Applicable
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2022/12/048423
- Lead Sponsor
- Pondicherry Institute of Medical Sciences
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ot Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
Inclusion Criteria
1. Patients belonging to American Society of Anesthesiologists grade I or II
2. Age: above 18yrs and below 65yrs
3. Mouth opening > 5cm
4. Patients posted for short surgical procedures < 3hours
Exclusion Criteria
1.Emergency surgeries
2.Presence of an upper airway anatomic variation or pathology
3. Surgery requiring lateral or prone position
4. Body mass index greater than 30 kg/m2
5. Patients having aspiration tendency(full stomach, history of stomach surgery,
gastroesophageal reflux, hiatal hernia, sore throat, upper respiratory airway infections).
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method To compare oropharyngeal leak pressure (OLP) of LMA Pro-seal and LMA <br/ ><br>protector when inserted under vision guidance using video laryngoscope.Timepoint: At 10min
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method 1. To assess the ease and accuracy of device insertion, ease of gastric tube placement. <br/ ><br>2. To detect the hemodynamic responses induced by airway insertion [blood pressure, <br/ ><br>heart rate, oxygen saturation and end-tidal carbon dioxide (EtCO2)]. <br/ ><br>3. To detect the incidence of postoperative complications such as the presence of blood <br/ ><br>on the device and severity of sore throat.Timepoint: 1.Once LMA is positioned correctly gastric tube is placed. <br/ ><br>2.Hemodynamic responses recorded at pre induction , post induction , 3min , 5min , 10min <br/ ><br>3.Post operative complications assessed within 3hrs