MedPath

Maximizing the Initial Experience of a Neophyte Scleral Lens Wearer

Not Applicable
Terminated
Conditions
Contact Lens Adaptation
Interventions
Device: DMV inserter (DMV® MagicTouch™) with an open end
Device: DMV inserter (DMV® MagicTouch™) with a closed end
Device: Three fingers (Patient's Hand)
Device: O-ring (Hardware Store Product)
Device: Tea light candle (Generic Deparment Store Product) with DMV inserter (DMV® MagicTouch™)
Registration Number
NCT04583579
Lead Sponsor
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Brief Summary

The goal of this proposal is to conduct a randomized controlled study aimed at learning the best method for applying scleral lenses and factors associated with successfully completing scleral lens application and removal training.

Detailed Description

Scleral lens (SL) prescribing has dramatically increased over the past few years likely because of the advent of better SL designs, better materials, and greater awareness of the technology. SL market growth has also likely increased because SLs were once reserved for patients with complex ocular surface diseases, though advances with SL technologies have allowed SL fitting to include patients with dry eye and even patients who have relatively uncomplicated refractive errors. While SLs are maintained and cared for much like soft contact lenses (e.g., they require a contact lens care system), SL wearers also need help with applying their lenses. Patients specifically are advised by their care provider to insert their SLs with their fingers (tripod method), a DMV inserter with an open or closed end (hole potentially aides in vision), or a specialized o-ring that is balanced on a finger. Our clinic also utilizes a tea light candle with a DMV inserter attached to the top of it when patients have mobility issues. While work from this investigator's study group has found that 54% of patients prefer DMV inserters for applying their SLs as compared to the above other options, these preliminary data were obtained through a cross-sectional electronic survey from subjects who completed their SL fitting up to two years ago. Therefore, the goal of this proposal is to conduct a randomized controlled study aimed at learning the best method for applying SLs and factors associated with successfully completing SL application and removal training. These data are needed because it will help practitioners with patient education and because it may increase the likelihood that patients will be successful with SLs.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
TERMINATED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
17
Inclusion Criteria
  • Adults (>18 years)
  • Must have an indication for needing scleral lenses
Read More
Exclusion Criteria
  • Participating in another research study
  • Unable to attend multiple visits
  • Advanced knowledge or past use of scleral lenses
  • A physical or mental condition that would prevent the subject from applying their own scleral lenses
Read More

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
SINGLE_GROUP
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
New Scleral Lens WearersDMV inserter (DMV® MagicTouch™) with an open endAll patients will be asked to wear scleral lenses for the duration of this study.
New Scleral Lens WearersO-ring (Hardware Store Product)All patients will be asked to wear scleral lenses for the duration of this study.
New Scleral Lens WearersDMV inserter (DMV® MagicTouch™) with a closed endAll patients will be asked to wear scleral lenses for the duration of this study.
New Scleral Lens WearersThree fingers (Patient's Hand)All patients will be asked to wear scleral lenses for the duration of this study.
New Scleral Lens WearersTea light candle (Generic Deparment Store Product) with DMV inserter (DMV® MagicTouch™)All patients will be asked to wear scleral lenses for the duration of this study.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Scleral Lens Application TimeAt Dispense Visit at Hour 0 (Visit 2)

Amount of time needed to apply scleral lenses to both eyes (minutes); each patient will try each application method in a random order.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Subject's Method PreferenceAt Dispense Visit at Hour 0 (Visit 2)

Patient top ranked preference of scleral lens application method (percent)

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

University of Alabama at Birmingham

🇺🇸

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath