Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT01856530
NCT01856530
Completed
Phase 1

Effect of Oxytocin on Pro-Social Behavior in Social Anxiety Disorder

Stefan G. Hofmann1 site in 1 country60 target enrollmentJuly 2012

Overview

Phase
Phase 1
Intervention
Oxytocin
Conditions
Social Anxiety Disorder
Sponsor
Stefan G. Hofmann
Enrollment
60
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Social Cooperation
Status
Completed
Last Updated
8 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to learn more about how the hormone, oxytocin, impacts social behavior in terms of cooperation with others, attention processing, and reward processing, among patients with social anxiety disorder. Based on available research, the investigators predict that in patients with social anxiety disorder, oxytocin will improve social cooperation during an online ball-tossing game called Cyberball, reduce attention toward socially threatening cues during a dot-probe task, and lead to greater willingness to work for monetary rewards for others rather than themselves during an effort expenditure task.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
July 2012
End Date
August 2013
Last Updated
8 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
Male

Investigators

Sponsor
Stefan G. Hofmann
Responsible Party
Sponsor Investigator
Principal Investigator

Stefan G. Hofmann

Principal Investigator

Boston University Charles River Campus

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Males \> 18 years of age with a primary (or co-principal) psychiatric diagnosis of social anxiety disorder (SAD), as defined by Diagnostic and Statistical Manual-IV (DSM-IV) criteria;
  • Current Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale (LSAS) score \> 60, which is a clinical threshold for SAD symptoms;
  • Comorbid present DSM-IV Major Depression, Dysthymia, Specific Phobia, or any of the other anxiety disorders as diagnosed by DSM-IV criteria will be permitted as long as SAD is primary (the disorder that is most distressing to the patient). Inclusion of patients with comorbidity will permit accrual of a more clinically relevant patient population;
  • Willingness to participate in and comply with the study procedures as indicated by signing the informed consent form.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Subjects with a serious medical illness for which hospitalization may be likely within the next three months;
  • Subjects with a current diagnosis of schizophrenia, psychotic disorders, bipolar disorder, mental disorder due to a medical condition or substance, substance abuse or dependence, as diagnosed by DSM-IV criteria;
  • Concurrent use of other psychotropic medications is excluded, except for antidepressants that have been taken at a stable dose for at least 2 weeks;
  • Active suicidal or homicidal ideation or suicide attempts within the past six months requiring hospitalization;
  • Subjects with significant nasal pathology (atrophic rhinitis, recurrent nose bleeds, or history of hypophysectomy);
  • Smokers who smoke more than 15 cigarettes per day;
  • Those who smoke cigarettes or have caffeine or alcohol within 24 hours of the study visit.

Arms & Interventions

Oxytocin

Liquid intranasal oxytocin, 24 IU, administered once

Intervention: Oxytocin

Placebo

Matched placebo nasal spray

Intervention: Placebo

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Social Cooperation

Time Frame: Day 1 (first day oxytocin or placebo was administered)

The outcome measure involved difference scores in the number of balls tossed to Player 1 between two conditions of the task. Across both conditions, the participant (always assigned as "Player 2") played with 3 other on-line players in real time. In Condition 1, Player 1 was programmed to toss on average 70% of his balls to the participant. In Condition 2, Player 1's behavior switched such that he was programmed to toss on average only 10% of his balls to the participant. The data reported below is the number of balls tossed to Player 1 in Condition 2 minus balls tossed under Condition 1.

Disengagement From Social Threat Cues

Time Frame: Day 1 (first day oxytocin or placebo was administered)

The outcome measure involved difference scores in response latencies on disengagement trials for disgust versus neutral cues. Difference scores were calculated as response latencies during disengagement trials for disgust cues minus response latencies during disengagement trials for neutral cues. Negative change scores represent an improvement in disengagement.

Secondary Outcomes

  • Perceived Trust Scores on a 1-7 Likert Scale(Day 1 (first day oxytocin or placebo was administered))
  • Perceived Empathy Scores on a 1-7 Likert Scale(Day 1 (first day oxytocin or placebo was administered))
  • Perceived Preference Scores on a 1-7 Likert Scale(Day 1 (first day oxytocin or placebo was administered))
  • Perceived Rejection Scores on a 1-7 Likert Scale(Day 1 (first day oxytocin or placebo was administered))

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials