MedPath

Comparison of 2-Dimensional and 3-Dimensional Laparoscopic Visions

Completed
Conditions
Diagnostic Self Evaluation
Interventions
Procedure: Laparoscopic surgery
Registration Number
NCT01799577
Lead Sponsor
Bagcilar Training and Research Hospital
Brief Summary

This study tests the hypothesis that use of the 3-D laparoscopic vision system (Viking Systems, La Jolla, CA) can significantly improve technical ability on a complex laparoscopic tasks in an experimental model.

Detailed Description

7 tasks on a 3-D laparoscopic instrument fitted to the trainer box and subjective criteria (4 point lickert scale) were evaluated for this study. Totally twenty-four participants (8 experienced, 8 minimal experienced and 8 novices) were evaluated for different 10 tasks (touch the marked circle, pass the two circle with needle, pick-beads and place, grape the suture, move the needle from one instrument to another instrument, pick-and-place, cutting, three different suturing) in term of total task time and error number. Statistical Package Program was used to perform statistical analyses. The data were presented as arithmetic means and standard deviations were calculated in each group. A P value of \<0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
24
Inclusion Criteria

medical doctors

Exclusion Criteria

disabled person (about arms or vision problems)

Study & Design

Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Study Design
Not specified
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
GynecologistLaparoscopic surgeryGynecologist can use laparoscopic surgery.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
In order to test whether the 3-D laparoscopy vision system is superior or not than the 2-D laparoscopic vision system.15 days

We want to test the 3-D laparoscopic vision system (Viking Systems, La Jolla, CA) can significantly improve technical ability on a complex laparoscopic tasks in an experimental model. 7 tasks on a 3-D laparoscopic instrument fitted to the trainer box and subjective criteria (4 point lickert scale) were evaluated for this study. Totally twenty-four participants (8 experienced, 8 minimal experienced and 8 novices) were evaluated for different 10 tasks in term of total task time and error number.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Bagcilar Trainig and Research Hospital

🇹🇷

Istanbul, Turkey

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath