MedPath

Endoscopic Pilonidal Sinus Treatment (EPSIT) Versus Sinus Laser Closure (SiLaC) Versus Lay Open Technique

Not Applicable
Conditions
Pilonidal Sinus
Interventions
Procedure: Endoscopic Pilonidal sinus treatment (EPSIT) versus Sinus Laser Closure (SiLaC) versus lay open technique
Registration Number
NCT04418336
Lead Sponsor
Mansoura University
Brief Summary

Aim of the work To compare Sinus Laser closure versus lay open technique versus Endoscopic pilonidal sinus treatment as regards recurrence rate, operative data, postoperative pain, intra and postoperative complications, healing time and return to daily activity.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
UNKNOWN
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
60
Inclusion Criteria
  • patients with symptoms from sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus .
Read More
Exclusion Criteria
  • Abscess formation
  • Immunodeficiency.
  • Patients with congenital asymptomatic pits.
  • Patient with psychiatric disease disabling surgical intervention. . Pregnant females.
Read More

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Endoscopic Pilonidal sinus treatment (EPSIT)Endoscopic Pilonidal sinus treatment (EPSIT) versus Sinus Laser Closure (SiLaC) versus lay open techniqueEndoscopic Pilonidal sinus treatment (EPSIT)
Sinus Laser Closure (SiLaC)Endoscopic Pilonidal sinus treatment (EPSIT) versus Sinus Laser Closure (SiLaC) versus lay open techniqueSinus Laser Closure (SiLaC)
lay open techniqueEndoscopic Pilonidal sinus treatment (EPSIT) versus Sinus Laser Closure (SiLaC) versus lay open techniquelay open technique
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Recurrenceone year

Recurrence of pilonidal sinus after treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Mansoura University

🇪🇬

Mansoura, Dakahlia, Egypt

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath