Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT04418336
NCT04418336UnknownNot Applicable

Endoscopic Pilonidal Sinus Treatment (EPSIT) Versus Sinus Laser Closure (SiLaC) Versus Lay Open Technique

Mansoura University1 site in 1 country60 target enrollmentStarted: June 1, 2020Last updated:
Conditions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Enrollment
60
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Recurrence

Study Overview

Brief Summary

Aim of the work To compare Sinus Laser closure versus lay open technique versus Endoscopic pilonidal sinus treatment as regards recurrence rate, operative data, postoperative pain, intra and postoperative complications, healing time and return to daily activity.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
None

Eligibility Criteria

Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • patients with symptoms from sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus .

Exclusion Criteria

  • Abscess formation
  • Immunodeficiency.
  • Patients with congenital asymptomatic pits.
  • Patient with psychiatric disease disabling surgical intervention. . Pregnant females.

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Recurrence

Time Frame: one year

Recurrence of pilonidal sinus after treatment

Secondary Outcomes

No secondary outcomes reported

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials