Endoscopic Pilonidal Sinus Treatment (EPSIT) Versus Sinus Laser Closure (SiLaC) Versus Lay Open Technique
Not Applicable
- Conditions
- Pilonidal Sinus
- Interventions
- Procedure: Endoscopic Pilonidal sinus treatment (EPSIT) versus Sinus Laser Closure (SiLaC) versus lay open technique
- Registration Number
- NCT04418336
- Lead Sponsor
- Mansoura University
- Brief Summary
Aim of the work To compare Sinus Laser closure versus lay open technique versus Endoscopic pilonidal sinus treatment as regards recurrence rate, operative data, postoperative pain, intra and postoperative complications, healing time and return to daily activity.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- UNKNOWN
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 60
Inclusion Criteria
- patients with symptoms from sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus .
Read More
Exclusion Criteria
- Abscess formation
- Immunodeficiency.
- Patients with congenital asymptomatic pits.
- Patient with psychiatric disease disabling surgical intervention. . Pregnant females.
Read More
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Endoscopic Pilonidal sinus treatment (EPSIT) Endoscopic Pilonidal sinus treatment (EPSIT) versus Sinus Laser Closure (SiLaC) versus lay open technique Endoscopic Pilonidal sinus treatment (EPSIT) Sinus Laser Closure (SiLaC) Endoscopic Pilonidal sinus treatment (EPSIT) versus Sinus Laser Closure (SiLaC) versus lay open technique Sinus Laser Closure (SiLaC) lay open technique Endoscopic Pilonidal sinus treatment (EPSIT) versus Sinus Laser Closure (SiLaC) versus lay open technique lay open technique
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Recurrence one year Recurrence of pilonidal sinus after treatment
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Mansoura University
🇪🇬Mansoura, Dakahlia, Egypt