Lay Open and Curettage Versus Endoscopic (E.P.Si.T) Method in the Treatment of Sacrococcygeal Pilonidal Sinus Disease
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 入组人数
- 30
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- recurrence rate
研究概览
简要总结
Aim of the work To compare lay open technique versus Endoscopic pilonidal sinus treatment as regards recurrence rate, operative data, postoperative pain, intra and postoperative complications, healing time and return to daily activity
详细描述
Introduction Pilonidal sinus is a very common inflammatory disease of gluteal region (McCallum et al., 2008). Its incidence is 26/100,000 and it usually occurs in working males of age 15 to 30.
The disease itself dates back to 1833 when Herbert Mayo, British Physiologist, Anatomist and Surgeon described it as a sinus containing hair follicles located in the sacrococcygeal region in a woman.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- None
入排标准
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •Adult patients of both genders with symptoms from sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus were included in our study.
排除标准
- •Abscess formation
- •Immunodeficiency.
- •Patients with congenital asymptomatic pits.
- •Patient with psychiatric disease disabling surgical intervention.
- •Pregnant females
结局指标
主要结局
recurrence rate
时间窗: one year
recurrence rate of pilonidal sinus symptoms after healing
次要结局
未报告次要终点
