Intervetional Lay Open and Curettage Versus Endoscopic (E.P.Si.T) Method in the Treatment of Sacrococcygeal Pilonidal Sinus Disease

Not Applicable

• Conditions: Endoscopic Pilonidal Sinus

• Registration Number: NCT04418310
• Lead Sponsor: Mansoura University

Brief Summary

Aim of the work To compare lay open technique versus Endoscopic pilonidal sinus treatment as regards recurrence rate, operative data, postoperative pain, intra and postoperative complications, healing time and return to daily activity

Detailed Description

Introduction Pilonidal sinus is a very common inflammatory disease of gluteal region (McCallum et al., 2008). Its incidence is 26/100,000 and it usually occurs in working males of age 15 to 30.

The disease itself dates back to 1833 when Herbert Mayo, British Physiologist, Anatomist and Surgeon described it as a sinus containing hair follicles located in the sacrococcygeal region in a woman.

Study Timeline

• Status Verified: 2020-05
• Study First Submitted: 2020-06-03
• Study First Submitted QC: 2020-06-04
• Study First Posted: 2020-06-05
• Study Start: 2020-06-12
• Last Update Submitted: 2020-06-17
• Last Update Posted: 2020-06-18
• Primary Completion: 2021-06
• Study Completion: 2021-07

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: UNKNOWN
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 30

Inclusion Criteria

• Adult patients of both genders with symptoms from sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus were included in our study.

Exclusion Criteria

• Abscess formation 2. Immunodeficiency. 3. Patients with congenital asymptomatic pits. 4. Patient with psychiatric disease disabling surgical intervention. 5. Pregnant females

Study & Design

• Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Design: PARALLEL

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
recurrence rate	one year	recurrence rate of pilonidal sinus symptoms after healing

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Mansoura University; 🇪🇬 Mansoura, Dakahlia, Egypt