跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT06493188
NCT06493188尚未招募不适用

Effectiveness of Low-fidelity Versus High-fidelity Interprofessional Simulation on the Acquisition of Theoretical and Practical Knowledge of Arterial Blood Gas Testing: a Parallel Randomized Controlled Trial

University of Turin, Italy2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 36 人开始时间: 2026年3月1日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
尚未招募
发起方
入组人数
36
试验地点
2
主要终点
Evaluation of Knowledge and Practices during the simulation

研究概览

简要总结

This randomized clinical trial will evaluate the effectiveness of an interprofessional simulation intervention for medical and nursing students.

The primary aim is to compare the effectiveness of high-fidelity versus low-fidelity interprofessional simulation in improving knowledge and skills related to the ABG test. The hypothesis is that participants in the high-fidelity interprofessional simulation group will develop better knowledge and skills for ABG testing compared to those in the low-fidelity group.

The secondary aims are to evaluate the effectiveness of high-fidelity interprofessional simulation compared to low-fidelity interprofessional simulation in (i) enhancing self-efficacy and self-confidence in learning, and (ii) improving interprofessional education and satisfaction with the simulation experience. It is hypothesized that participants in the high-fidelity interprofessional simulation group will report higher levels of self-efficacy, self-confidence, interprofessional education, and satisfaction with the learning experience post-intervention compared to those in the low-fidelity interprofessional simulation group.

The key questions it seeks to address are:

  1. Does high-fidelity interprofessional simulation help in developing better technical skills for ABG testing?
  2. Does high-fidelity interprofessional simulation lead to greater self-efficacy and self-confidence?
  3. Does high-fidelity interprofessional simulation lead to greater satisfaction with the experience, readiness for interprofessional simulation, and better perceptions of interprofessional education?

The researchers will compare high-fidelity interprofessional simulation (immersive medical training room with an actor) to low-fidelity interprofessional simulation (a structured clinical case analysis) to assess whether high-fidelity simulation effectively enhances knowledge and skills on arterial blood gas tests, as well as interprofessional collaboration and attitudes.

Participants will:

  • Attend brief interactive lessons on the principles, technique, and interpretation of arterial blood gas tests.
  • Participate in a series of clinical-based interprofessional simulation scenarios delivered in low- or high-fidelity.

详细描述

After randomization, participants will be assigned sequentially into ten groups to form five high-fidelity interprofessional simulation groups and five low-fidelity interprofessional simulation groups. Each group will consist of six students, including three medical students and three nursing students.

Students will be asked to review and sign the informed consent form to confirm their participation in the study.

Participants will be asked to complete the baseline assessment by completing a questionnaire set. They will be subjected to a brief educational video covering the definition and purpose of the ABG test, the diagnostic and clinical rationale for conducting it, and the technique, including patient assessment, required equipment, factors to consider before performing the procedure, questions to ask the patient, identification of the puncture site, sampling steps, and proper disposal of materials. Additionally, a brief interpretation of ABG test results will be provided, focusing on pH values, carbon dioxide levels, and bicarbonate levels to identify the four main diagnoses: respiratory acidosis, metabolic acidosis, respiratory alkalosis, and metabolic alkalosis.

At the end of the video presentation, participants will be informed about which group they have been assigned to.

During the simulation activities, two independent observers will assess the performance of participants.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Other
盲法
None (Outcomes Assessor)

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Early-career students (First-year Nursing Bachelor's Degree; second-year Medicine & Surgery Degree)
  • Regularly enrolled in their courses (attended at least 70% of classes)
  • Proficient in English (reading and speaking)
  • Aged 18 years or older

排除标准

  • Students who have previously taken classes on arterial blood gas sampling
  • Those who have prior work experience as healthcare professionals (e.g., laboratory technicians, phlebotomists)
  • Students who have previously experience in interprofessional learning activities
  • Students who have previously experience in the simulation center

结局指标

主要结局

Evaluation of Knowledge and Practices during the simulation

时间窗: 10 minutes - During the simulation scenarios

Purposefully Developed 6-item Checklist

次要结局

  • General Self Efficacy Scale - GSE(10 minutes Pre-intervention and post-intervention)
  • Satisfaction with simulation experience - SSE(Post-intervention)
  • Student Satisfaction and Self-Confidence in Learning - SCLS(Post-intervention)
  • Interdisciplinary Education Perception Scale - IEPS(10 minutes Pre-intervention and post-intervention)
  • Readiness for Interprofessional Learning Scale - RIPLS(10 minutes Pre-intervention and post-intervention)

研究者

发起方
University of Turin, Italy
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验