Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT01124097
NCT01124097
Terminated
Phase 3

A Phase 3, Double Blind, Randomized, Placebo Controlled, Parallel Group, Multicenter Clinical Study of Eslicarbazepine Acetate in Post-Herpetic Neuralgia

Bial - Portela C S.A.1 site in 1 country240 target enrollmentSeptember 2010

Overview

Phase
Phase 3
Intervention
Eslicarbazepine acetate (BIA 2-093)
Conditions
Post Herpetic Neuralgia
Sponsor
Bial - Portela C S.A.
Enrollment
240
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Change From Baseline to Endpoint in Mean Pain
Status
Terminated
Last Updated
12 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

The primary objective of this study is to assess the efficacy of Eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) as therapy in subjects with Post-herpetic Neuralgia (PHN) over a 15 week treatment phase.

Detailed Description

Post-herpetic neuralgia (PHN) is a syndrome of intractable pain following an acute infection of herpes zoster (shingles). Treatment for PHN is often suboptimal. More than 50% of the subjects fail to respond to pharmacological treatments or experience intolerable side effects. The clinical development of ESL to treat neuropathic pain is based on its chemical and pharmacodynamic relationship to sodium channel blockers, including carbamazepine, which is effective for treating some neuropathic pain conditions. Preclinical data supports the theoretical background. This study will examine the efficacy, safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of Eslicarbazepine acetate for the treatment of post herpetic neuralgia.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
September 2010
End Date
April 2012
Last Updated
12 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Sponsor
Bial - Portela C S.A.
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Male and female outpatients aged 18 years or older. Female subjects are of nonchildbearing potential, defined as surgical sterilization (hysterectomy or bilateral oophorectomy or tubal ligation) or at least 2 years postmenopausal (spontaneous amenorrhea for at least 24 months before Visit 1), or if of childbearing potential, subjects agree to use a medically acceptable nonhormonal method of contraception.
  • Experiencing pain for at least 6 months after the healing of a herpes zoster skin rash.
  • A mean score between 4.0 and 9.0, inclusive, on the 24 hour average pain intensity assessment.
  • Compliance with patient diary completion.
  • If not used to treat PHN, subjects are permitted to take nonsteroidal anti inflammatory drugs and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors if they were kept on a stable dose for 1 month prior to Screening and are foreseen to remain stable throughout the study.
  • Competent and able to freely give own informed consent.
  • Female subjects of childbearing potential, who are not currently breastfeeding, must have a negative serum pregnancy test at Visit 1.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Historical exposure to drugs known to cause neuropathy
  • Significant skin lesions (active infection, ulcer, etc).
  • Known intolerance to ESL or to other carboxamide derivatives (eg, carbamazepine or oxcarbazepine) or frequent or severe allergic reactions with multiple medications.
  • Subjects who previously participated in a clinical study with ESL.
  • Major psychiatric disorder.
  • Serious or unstable cardiovascular disease that could compromise participation or cause hospitalization during the study.
  • Second or third degree atrioventricular blockade not corrected with a pacemaker or any clinically significant abnormality in the 12 lead electrocardiogram as determined by the investigator.
  • Subjects taking the following drug classes and individual drugs are excluded: benzodiazepines (except short half life sleep agents), skeletal muscle relaxants, orally administered steroids, capsaicin, mexiletine, centrally acting analgesics (dextromethorphan, tramadol), opiates, topical lidocaine, anticonvulsants, tricyclic antidepressants, and serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors. These drugs require a minimum washout period of at least 5 times the half life and should be tapered appropriately using product label instructions as a guide.
  • Relevant clinical laboratory abnormality that, in the investigator's opinion, can compromise the subject's safety.
  • History of drug abuse or dependence (drug categories defined by DSM IV) within the past year, excluding nicotine and caffeine.

Arms & Interventions

Eslicarbazepine acetate 800 mg once daily (QD)

Intervention: Eslicarbazepine acetate (BIA 2-093)

Eslicarbazepine acetate 1200 mg QD

Intervention: Eslicarbazepine acetate (BIA 2-093)

Eslicarbazepine acetate 1600 mg QD

Intervention: Eslicarbazepine acetate (BIA 2-093)

Placebo

Intervention: Placebo

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Change From Baseline to Endpoint in Mean Pain

Time Frame: baseline to endpoint

The efficacy analysis was restricted to the primary efficacy variable in the analysis population. The intended treatment period, starting on the day of the randomization and ending at the efficacy cut-off date (October 31, 2011), was the basis for the analysis. The primary efficacy variable was the difference between the mean values of 7 daily pain scores preceding the efficacy cut-off date (endpoint mean pain score), and before randomization (baseline mean pain score), respectively. The daily pain scores were based on the morning response to the 11-point Numeric Rating Pain Scale (NRPS) question relating to average pain intensity over the last 24 hours. The NPRS is an 11-point scale from 0-10 \["0" = no pain; "10" = the most intense pain imaginable\]

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials