MedPath

Evaluation of Intracanal Reinforcement with Short Composite Post in Upper Primary Incisors with Severly Carious Teeth As in Early Childhood Caries Cases Using Randomized Clinical Trial

Not Applicable
Not yet recruiting
Conditions
Composite Post
Intracanal Reinfocement
Registration Number
NCT06740643
Lead Sponsor
Cairo University
Brief Summary

Severely damaged incisors may lead to difficulty in speech, decreased masticatory efficiency, abnormal tongue habits, subsequent malocclusions, and psychological and self-esteem problems. There are several methods mentioned in the literature for the restoration of severely decayed primary anterior teeth. The benefits of pulp therapy include: removing cavitations or defects to eliminate areas that are susceptible to caries; stopping the progression of tooth demineralization; restoring the integrity of tooth structure; preventing the spread of infection and preventing the shifting of teeth due to loss of tooth structure. The risks of pulp therapy include lessening the longevity of teeth by making them more susceptible to fracture as after removal of gross caries lesion and gaining access to the pulp the tooth become too weak, recurrent lesions, restoration failure, complications, and iatrogenic damage to adjacent teeth.

There are different techniques can be used for gaining intracanal retention in primary teeth. one of these techniques is resin composite posts.

Composite post restorations have been in used in primary teeth from 1986. They yield satisfactory results when there is normal masticatory function, a balanced diet, and hygiene control.

The evidence to support any method of intracanal reinforcement for restoring grossly broken down anterior teeth is presently lacking.

This study aims to Evaluate the intracanal reinforcement with short composite post in upper primary incisors versus no reinforcement.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
62
Inclusion Criteria
  • Children Criteria:

    • Medically free.
    • Cooperative patient.
    • Age (3 - 5 years)

Incisors criteria:

• Upper primary incisors show large carious lesions.

Radiographic criteria:

• No evidence of internal/external pathologic root resorption.

Exclusion Criteria
  • • Uncooperative children.

    • Children with systemic disease.
    • Refusal of participation in the study.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Crown success1 year

binary ( presence or abscence of the zircon crown)

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Clinically :Gingival health.1 year

* A: No obvious sign of inflammation.

* B: Mild marginal gingivitis - tissue slightly reddened and edematous.

* C: Moderate marginal gingivitis - tissue obviously reddened and edematous.

* D: Sever gingivitis - tissue is very sollowen: spontaneous bleeding.

Radiographic assessment.1 year

* A: Healthy no pathosis noted.

* B: Pathosis apparent but not requiring immediate treatment.

* C: Pathosis apparent requiring immediate treatment.

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath