MedPath

Proton Pencil Beam Scanning GRID for Treatment of Bulky Tumors

Not Applicable
Active, not recruiting
Conditions
Sarcoma
Melanoma
Interventions
Radiation: Pro-GRID
Registration Number
NCT05121545
Lead Sponsor
Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins
Brief Summary

This is a single arm, phase I study, evaluating the feasibility, toxicity, and degree of tumor response after novel proton pencil beam scanning (PBS GRID) treatment in patients with bulky tumors that are difficult to manage.

Detailed Description

The proton group at Sibley Memorial Hospital has developed a new method for multi-beam proton delivery making it possible to arrange and optimize GRID dosimetry and normal tissue sparing compared to other similar techniques.

In this phase I pilot study, patients with bulky tumors will receive this novel method of GRID-therapy also called spatially-fractionated radiotherapy which involves delivering high dose radiation to small amounts of tumor in a manner that creates alternating regions of high and low dose radiation within the tumor and is often aligned in a grid pattern.

In so doing, this study will ascertain the feasibility, safety and tumor response i.e. shrinkage and resectability of this treatment. Ultimately, the goal is to improve local outcomes of patients with bulky tumors and to offer new treatment options for patients with difficult-to-manage bulky tumors.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
11
Inclusion Criteria
  • Age > 18
  • Histologically or cytologically confirmed invasive cancer
  • Bulky tumor > 7 cm, determined clinically and/or radiographically, at the time of evaluation prior to enrollment
  • Treated indicated for palliative intent
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status < 2
  • Anticipated treatment deemed safe on pre-review by PI
  • For patients with prior Radiation Therapy (RT): Dicoms must be available for dose fusion if overlap anticipated with GRID
  • Willing and able to provide informed consent
  • Discussion with medical oncology or surgical specialty
Exclusion Criteria
  • Age < 18
  • ECOG performance status 3-4
  • Planned for definitive, curative management
  • For patients with prior RT that overlaps with Pro-GRID: Dicoms not available Pregnant women
  • Tumor encasing critical structure, as defined by the treating MD.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
SINGLE_GROUP
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Pro-GRID treatment ArmPro-GRIDPatients enrolled in this study will receive spatially-fractionated radiotherapy or GRID-therapy, which involves delivering a one-time treatment of high dose radiation to small amounts of tumor in a manner that creates alternating regions of high and low dose radiation within the tumor. Patients will receive 2 (lowest dose) to 18 Gy (highest dose) in a single fraction.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Feasibility of the Pro-GRID intervention as assessed by success of intervention delivery for a number of participants1.5 years

To assess the feasibility of successfully creating treatment plans and delivering a novel proton therapy called Pro-GRID. Feasibility will be determined by a successful intervention delivery for 10 of 12 patients with bulky solid tumors.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Change in rate of treatment response of bulky tumors treated and not treated with proton GRID therapy1, 6 and 12 months post-treatment

To determine the change in response rate for bulky tumors treated and not treated with Proton GRID by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) criteria.

Change in degree of treatment response of bulky tumors treated and not treated with proton GRID therapy1, 6 and 12 months post-treatment

Change in degree of treatment response would be measured by RECIST criteria (partial response, complete response, stable disease, or progression of disease).

Rate of toxicity as assessed by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v4)3 months post-treatment

To determine the rate of mild acute toxicity, defined as any CTCAE grade 2 or lower toxicity, and severe acute toxicity, defined as any CTCAE grade 3 or higher toxicity.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Sibley Memorial Hospital

🇺🇸

Washington, District of Columbia, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath