跳至主要内容
临床试验/CTRI/2024/03/064260
CTRI/2024/03/064260尚未招募3 期

Comparison of early postoperative analgesia between LTAP (Laparoscopic assisted Transversus Abdominus Plane) block and USG-RS (ultrasound guided Rectus Sheath) block in laparoscopic colorectal surgery – Randomized control trial.

Dr.Savarinjebha J1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 80 人开始时间: 2024年3月25日最近更新:

试验速览

阶段
3 期
状态
尚未招募
发起方
入组人数
80
试验地点
1
主要终点
Comparison of post op analgesia at rest and on movement

研究概览

简要总结

Minimally invasive surgery in colorectal surgery has become the standard of care for

cancer of the large intestine. For the extraction of the resected specimen a midline incision is

made. However, postoperative pain is significantly high and often requires intravenous opioid

analgesia.

Regional anaesthesia techniques help mitigating post-operative pain without the side effects

of opioids and help in early recovery. The somatic innervation of the abdomen traverses

through the tranversus abdominal plane and instillation of local anaesthetics into the plane.

The ubiquitous availability of ultrasound had made the regional anaesthesia more reliable and

safer, while requiring some skills to effectively administer the block. In laparoscopic surgery,

administering local anaesthetics under direct vision.

In colorectal surgery, the incision is made midline where the TAP block may not cover

adequately. Rectus sheath block may be more effective in covering midline incision.

Our study aims to compare the efficacy of LTAP (administered by surgeons) and bilateral

rectus sheath block (by anaesthetists) in decreasing immediate postoperative pain and

evaluation of the effects of vital capacity.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
盲法
Participant and Investigator Blinded

入排标准

年龄范围
18.00 Year(s) 至 60.00 Year(s)(—)
性别
All

入选标准

  • Age between 18 to 60, ii.
  • All ASA 1 to 2 patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

排除标准

  • Patient refusal
  • Ideal body weight less than 50 kg
  • ASA >3 patient
  • Emergency surgery
  • Allergic to local anaesthetic
  • Later converted to open laparotomy
  • Contraindication to opoids and NSAIDS.

结局指标

主要结局

Comparison of post op analgesia at rest and on movement

时间窗: 24 hours

次要结局

  • 1. Comparison of the total analgesia used in postoperative 24 hours.(2. postoperative incentive spirometry lung volumes)

研究者

发起方
Dr.Savarinjebha J
申办方类型
Other [self]
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

DrSavarinjebha J

Christian Medical College

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验