Short Term Clinical Study Investigating the Efficacy of an Occluding Dentifrice in Providing Relief From Dentinal Hypersensitivity

Phase 4

Completed

• Conditions: Dentin Sensitivity
• Interventions: Other: stannous fluoride; Other: sodium monofluorophosphate

• Registration Number: NCT02731833
• Lead Sponsor: GlaxoSmithKline

Brief Summary

This single centre, comparative design study will be used to investigate the efficacy of an experimental stannous fluoride containing dentifrice in relieving dentinal hypersensitivity (DH) after short term use compared with a standard fluoride dentifrice

Detailed Description

This will be a single centre, three day, randomised, examiner blind, two treatment arm, parallel design, stratified (by maximum baseline Schiff sensitivity score of the two selected test teeth), controlled study, in participants with at least two sensitive teeth that meet all the criteria at the screening and baseline (pre-treatment) visits. Dentinal hypersensitivity will be assessed at baseline (pre-treatment), post-treatment and after 3 days twice daily brushing

Study Timeline

• Study Start: 2016-04-01
• Study First Submitted: 2016-04-04
• Study First Submitted QC: 2016-04-04
• Study First Posted: 2016-04-08
• Primary Completion: 2016-05-01
• Study Completion: 2016-05-20
• Results First Submitted: 2017-01-20
• Results First Submitted QC: 2017-01-20
• Results First Posted: 2017-03-15
• Status Verified: 2017-04
• Last Update Submitted: 2017-04-19
• Last Update Posted: 2017-05-17

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: COMPLETED
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 229

Inclusion Criteria

• Demonstrates understanding of the study procedures, restrictions and willingness to participate as evidenced by voluntary written informed consent and has received a signed and dated copy of the informed consent form
• Aged 18-65 years inclusive
• Understands and is willing, able and likely to comply with all study procedures and restrictions
• Good general and mental health with, in the opinion of the investigator or medically qualified designee: a) No clinically significant and relevant abnormalities of medical history or oral examination. b) Absence of any condition that would impact on the participant's safety or wellbeing or affect the individual's ability to understand and follow study procedures and requirements
• Self-reported history of dentinal hypersensitivity (DH) lasting more than six months but not more than 10 years
• Minimum of 20 natural teeth
• Minimum of 2 accessible non-adjacent teeth (incisors, canines, pre-molars), preferably in different quadrants, that meet all of the following criteria: Signs of facial/cervical gingival recession and/or signs of erosion or abrasion (EAR), Tooth with MGI score =0 adjacent to the test area (exposed dentine) only [Lobene, 1986] and a clinical mobility of ≤1, Tooth with signs of sensitivity measured by qualifying evaporative air assessment (Y/N response)
• Minimum of two, non-adjacent accessible teeth (incisors, canines, pre-molars), that meet all of the following criteria: Tooth with signs of sensitivity, measured by qualifying tactile stimulus (Yeaple ≤ 20g) and evaporative air assessment (Schiff sensitivity score ≥ 2)

Read More

Exclusion Criteria

• Women who are known to be pregnant or who are intending to become pregnant over the duration of the study
• Women who are breast-feeding
• Known or suspected intolerance or hypersensitivity to the study materials (or closely related compounds) or any of their stated ingredients
• Participation in another clinical study (including cosmetic studies) or receipt of an investigational drug within 30 days of the screening visit.
• Previous participation in this study
• Recent history (within the last year) of alcohol or other substance abuse
• An employee of the sponsor or the study site or members of their immediate family
• Presence of chronic debilitating disease which, in the opinion of the investigator, could affect study outcomes or Any condition which, in the opinion of the investigator, causes xerostomia
• Dental prophylaxis within 4 weeks of Screening or Tongue or lip piercing or presence of dental implants
• Gross periodontal disease, treatment of periodontal disease (including surgery) within 12 months of Screening, scaling or root planning within 3 months of Screening and teeth bleaching within 8 weeks of Screening
• Tooth with evidence of current or recent caries, or reported treatment of decay within 12 months of Screening
• Tooth with exposed dentine but with deep, defective or facial restorations, teeth used as abutments for fixed or removable partial dentures, teeth with full crowns or veneers, orthodontic bands or cracked enamel. Sensitive teeth with contributing aetiologies other than erosion, abrasion or recession of exposed dentine
• Sensitive tooth not expected to respond to treatment with an over-the-counter dentifrice in the opinion of the investigator
• Use of an oral care product indicated for the relief of dentine hypersensitivity within 8 weeks of screening (participants will be required to bring their current oral care products to the site in order to verify the absence of known anti-sensitivity ingredients)
• Daily doses of medication/treatments which, in the opinion of the investigator, could interfere with the perception of pain. Examples of such medications include analgesics, anticonvulsants, antihistamines that cause marked or moderate sedation, sedatives, tranquilisers, anti-depressants, mood-altering and anti-inflammatory drugs
• Currently taking antibiotics or has taken antibiotics within 2 weeks of Baseline

Read More

Study & Design

• Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Design: PARALLEL

Arm && Interventions

Group	Intervention	Description
Test dentifrice	stannous fluoride	Participants will be instructed to dose a dry toothbrush with a full strip (1 inch) of toothpaste. Participants will then brush each of the two selected sensitive test teeth first followed by the whole mouth thoroughly for at least 1 minute
Control dentifrice	sodium monofluorophosphate	Participants will be instructed to dose a dry toothbrush with a full strip (1 inch) of toothpaste. Participants will then brush whole mouth thoroughly for at least 1 minute

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Change From Baseline in Schiff Sensitivity Score on Day 3	Baseline to Day 3	The examiner assessed the participant's response to an evaporative air stimulus for each tooth using the Schiff Sensitivity Scale which was scored as follows - 0: Participant does not respond to air stimulation; 1: Participant responded to air stimulus but does not request discontinuation of stimulus; 2: Participant responded to air stimulus and requests discontinuation or moves from stimulus; 3: Participant responded to stimulus, considered stimulus to be painful, and requested discontinuation of the stimulus. A reduction in Schiff Sensitivity score was indicative of an improvement in sensitivity.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Change From Baseline in Schiff Sensitivity Score Post First Treatment by Direct Application	Baseline to 60 seconds post first treatment	The examiner assessed the participant's response to an evaporative air stimulus for each tooth using the Schiff Sensitivity Scale which was scored as follows - 0: Participant does not respond to air stimulation; 1: Participant responded to air stimulus but does not request discontinuation of stimulus; 2: Participant responded to air stimulus and requests discontinuation or moves from stimulus; 3: Participant responded to stimulus, considered stimulus to be painful, and requested discontinuation of the stimulus. A reduction in Schiff Sensitivity score was indicative of an improvement in sensitivity.
Change From Baseline in Tactile Threshold Post First Treatment by Direct Application	Baseline to 60 seconds post first treatment	The examiner assessed the response to tactile sensitivity using a Yeaple probe which allowed application of a known force to the dentin surface, starting at 10g and rising in increments of 10g until the tactile threshold or maximum force was reached. The tactile threshold for each tooth was determined by asking the participant whether the sensation caused discomfort. The pressure setting at which the participant gives two consecutive 'yes' responses was recorded as the tactile threshold. The higher the tactile threshold, the less sensitive the tooth.
Change From Baseline in Tactile Threshold on Day 3	Baseline to Day 3	The examiner assessed the response to tactile sensitivity using a Yeaple probe which allowed application of a known force to the dentin surface, starting at 10g and rising in increments of 10g until the tactile threshold or maximum force was reached. The tactile threshold for each tooth was determined by asking the participant whether the sensation caused discomfort. The pressure setting at which the participant gives two consecutive 'yes' responses was recorded as the tactile threshold. The higher the tactile threshold, the less sensitive the tooth.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

GSK Investigational Site; 🇨🇦 Mississauga, Ontario, Canada