Does treating the posterior shoulder area stiffness in athletes affect the positional relationship of the shoulder joint?
Not Applicable
- Conditions
- Adult
- Registration Number
- JPRN-UMIN000042080
- Lead Sponsor
- Sadamatsu Hospital
- Brief Summary
The ISR group showed 17.2degree (p = .003) improvement in flexion, 10.1degree (p = .01) in HAd, 13.0degree (p = .005) in IR and 16.4degree (p = .004) in total arc (ER+IR). Humeral head position did not change in any groups and showed no correlation with range of motion.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Complete: follow-up complete
- Sex
- Male
- Target Recruitment
- 24
Inclusion Criteria
Not provided
Exclusion Criteria
had a history of surgery on the shoulder, had any injuries, pain, or dysfunction in the shoulder, neck, spine or upper extremity at the time of the study could not understand the subject had problems with communication could not undergo Magnetic Resonance Imaging, e.g. claustrophobia were participating in overhead activities, competitive sports, or weight training.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method range of motion
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method humeral head position relative to the glenoid