Comparative evaluation of de-epithelialized gingival unit graft (d-GUG) using modified bridge flap technique and de-epithelialized gingival unit graft (d-GUG) alone in management of gingival recession - A randomized controlled clinical study
试验速览
- 阶段
- 2 期
- 状态
- 尚未招募
- 发起方
- SELF
- 入组人数
- 30
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- To evaluate the root coverage by using de-epithelialized gingival unit graft with modified bridge flap technique
研究概览
简要总结
Gingival recession is a condition where the denudation of root surfaces occurs due to the relocation of the gingival margin apical to the cement-enamel junction (CEJ), leading to root hypersensitivity and aesthetic problems.
AIM OF THE STUDY The aim of present study is to evaluate and compare soft tissue parameters and root coverage using de epithelized gingival unit graft (d-GUG) along with modified bridge flap technique and de epithelized gingival unit graft (d-GUG) alone in Gingival Recession.
OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY: To evaluate the root coverage by using de-epithelialized gingival unit graft with modified bridge flap technique. To evaluate the root coverage by using de-epithelialized gingival unit graft alone.
GROUP I (TEST): 15 sites will be treated by de epithelized gingival unit graft (d-GUG) along with modified bridge flap technique.
GROUP II (CONTROL): 15 sites will be treated by de epithelized gingival unit graft (d-GUG) alone.
Following clinical parameters will be measured using University of North Carolina (UNC) – 15 and assessed at baseline, 1 month and 3 months. Customized acrylic stents for each patient, with grooves corresponding to mid buccal surface of defects will be made to ensure accurate readings. Recession depth (RD) – the distance between cementoenamel junction (CEJ) and most apical portion of the gingival margin. Recession width (RW) – width of recession defect at the level of CEJ. Probing depth (PD) – distance from the gingival margin to bottom of the gingival sulcus. Thickness of keratinized tissue (KTT) – determined at a distance of 1.5 mm apical to gingival margin using short anesthesia needle and rubber disc stopper.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Random Number Table
- 盲法
- Participant, Investigator and Outcome Assessor Blinded
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18.00 Year(s) 至 50.00 Year(s)（—）
- 性别
- All
入选标准
- •Individuals from 18 to 50 years Single/two adjacent teeth with miller’s class I or class II gingival recession defects Teeth with identifiable Cemento Enamel Junction (CEJ) Nonsmoker.
排除标准
- •Prominent root surface Presence of anatomic factors such as shallow vestibule/inadequate keratinized gingiva or aberrant frenum which might impair passive coronal positioning of the flap Presence of non-carious cervical lesions or root caries Pregnant patients Patients with systemic conditions.
结局指标
主要结局
To evaluate the root coverage by using de-epithelialized gingival unit graft with modified bridge flap technique
时间窗: To evaluate the root coverage by using de-epithelialized gingival unit graft with modified bridge flap technique | To evaluate the root coverage by using de-epithelialized gingival unit graft alone | To compare the outcome of both the techniques at baseline 4 weeks and 12 weeks
To evaluate the root coverage by using de-epithelialized gingival unit graft alone
时间窗: To evaluate the root coverage by using de-epithelialized gingival unit graft with modified bridge flap technique | To evaluate the root coverage by using de-epithelialized gingival unit graft alone | To compare the outcome of both the techniques at baseline 4 weeks and 12 weeks
To compare the outcome of both the techniques
时间窗: To evaluate the root coverage by using de-epithelialized gingival unit graft with modified bridge flap technique | To evaluate the root coverage by using de-epithelialized gingival unit graft alone | To compare the outcome of both the techniques at baseline 4 weeks and 12 weeks
次要结局
未报告次要终点