Cosmetic Outcomes of Simple Facial Lacerations Repaired With Dermabond Compared With Dermabond With Underlying Steristrips: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Overview
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Facial Laceration
- Sponsor
- University of Texas at Austin
- Enrollment
- 120
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- Cosmesis
- Status
- Completed
- Last Updated
- 6 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
The purpose of the study is to compare cosmetic outcomes of simple facial lacerations in children repaired with Dermabond (skin glue) compared with Dermabond (skin glue) with underlying steristrips (skin adhesive strips).
Investigators
Erin D Munns
Fellow Physician
University of Texas at Austin
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •Age ≤17 years old
- •Presents with simple, linear facial laceration requiring repair
- •English or Spanish speaking parents or guardians
Exclusion Criteria
- •Laceration to lips, nose, ear, eyelids, eyebrows
- •Laceration requiring multi-layer closure
- •Laceration requiring sub-specialty care
- •Laceration that has previously been repaired
- •Animal/human bites
- •Lacerations \>5cm in length
- •Allergy to adhesive
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Cosmesis
Time Frame: 2 months after repair
cosmetic scar outcome; photo will be taken of scar at 2 months and graded using a visual analog scale (VAS) by blinded reviewers. The VAS is a 0-100mm standardized scale where 0mm represents the "worst scar" and 100mm represents the "best scar" and reviewers will place a marking along the line of where they feel the scar belongs.
Secondary Outcomes
- Ease of repair of laceration(Day 0 (physician will complete just after the repair))
- Time to repair laceration(Day 0 (physician will complete just after the repair))
- Type of analgesia & sedation required(Day 0 (physician will complete just after the repair))
- Wound dehiscence(1 week)
- Wound infection(1 week)