跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT01385878
NCT01385878Unknown不适用

Intraoperative Performance & Postoperative Outcomes Following Phacoemulsification With 1.8 & 2.2mm Incision: Randomized Clinical Trial

Iladevi Cataract and IOL Research Center2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 110 人开始时间: 2011年1月1日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
发起方
入组人数
110
试验地点
2
主要终点
Ingress of Trypan blue from the Ocular Surface into the Anterior Chamber

研究概览

简要总结

Cataract surgical techniques have significantly changed in recent years with the widespread adoption of smaller and smaller clear corneal incisions for phacoemulsification. Microincision surgery has many advantages, including reduced surgically induced astigmatism, faster visual recovery, and reduced intra and postoperative inflammation. Curently, microcoaxial phacoemulsification is being performed through 1.8 as well as 2.2 mm incisions. However, there is still a debate as to which is the best absolute incision size for microcoaxial cataract surgery.

The aim of this study is to evaluate incision stability following microcoaxial phacoemulsification performed through 1.8 and 2.2 mm systems, as well as compare intraoperative performance and postoperative outcomes following microcoaxial phacoemulsification performed through these two incision sizes.

详细描述

Cataract surgical techniques have significantly changed in recent years with the widespread adoption of smaller and smaller clear corneal incisions for phacoemulsification. Microincision surgery has many advantages, including reduced surgically induced astigmatism, faster visual recovery, and reduced intra and postoperative inflammation. In the recent times, microcoaxial phacoemulsification has gained popularity. The main advantage of this newer technique is that it uses the same methods as the conventional method but with smaller incisions. Curently, microcoaxial phacoemulsification is being performed through 1.8 as well as 2.2 mm incisions. However, there is still a debate as to which is the best absolute incision size for microcoaxial cataract surgery.

The aim of this study is to evaluate incision stability following microcoaxial phacoemulsification performed through 1.8 and 2.2 mm systems, as well as compare intraoperative performance and postoperative outcomes following microcoaxial phacoemulsification performed through these two incision sizes.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Double (Participant, Outcomes Assessor)

入排标准

年龄范围
50 Years 至 80 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Uncomplicated age related cataracts, NO grade II III, IV (LOCS III classification)

排除标准

  • Ocular comorbidity, glaucoma, uveitis, shallow anterior chamber, maximal pupillary dilatation <6mm, high myopia (axial length > 25mm), previous ocular trauma or surgery, pseudoexfoliation, traumatic cataract, subluxated cataract

结局指标

主要结局

Ingress of Trypan blue from the Ocular Surface into the Anterior Chamber

时间窗: Immediately at the end of surgery

At end of surgery, stromal hydration of all incisions will be performed.0.0125% trypan blue will be instilled on the conjunctival surface.After 2 minutes, the surface will be irrigated with balanced salt solution. 0.1ml aqeous aspirate will be obtained from the anterior chamber.Concentration of trypan blue in the aspirate will be ascertained by UV visible spectrophotometry. Log dilutions of concentration of trypan blue will be used for statistical analysis

次要结局

  • Surgically Induced Astigmatism(At baseline and 3 months postoperatively)
  • Corneal Endothelial Cell Loss(Baseline and 3 months postoperatively)
  • Change in Central Corneal Thickness(Baseline and 1 week)
  • Anterior Chamber Inflammation(Baseline and 1 month)

研究者

发起方
Iladevi Cataract and IOL Research Center
申办方类型
Other

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验