跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT04215250
NCT04215250已完成不适用

Accuracy of CVC Depth Prediction in Internal Jugular Veins: The Difference Between The Andropoulos and ECG Methods

Indonesia University1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 72 人开始时间: 2019年12月12日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
72
试验地点
1
主要终点
CVC prediction depth using andropulous equation

研究概览

简要总结

compare the accuracy of CVC depth prediction in internal jugular veins: the difference between the andropoulos and ECG methods

详细描述

seventy two subjects were given informed consent before the study started. compare the accuracy of CVC depth prediction in internal jugular veins with two difference methods, the andropoulos method and ECG method.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Non Randomized
干预模型
Single Group
主要目的
Diagnostic
盲法
None

入排标准

性别
All
接受健康志愿者
否

入选标准

  • •signing informed consent form
  • •indicated for CVC insertion
  • •has no contraindication for right internal jugular vein CVC insertion

排除标准

  • •has history of arrhythmia
  • •has cardiac malformation history

研究组 & 干预措施

Andropulous method

Active Comparator

Andropulous method uses equations to determine the depth of CVC insertion.

For subject with <100 cm in height:

Depth of CVC insertion (cm) = (height (cm)/ 10)-1

For subject with >100 cm in height:

Depth of CVC insertion (cm) = (height (cm)/ 10)-2

干预措施: andropulous method (Other)

ECG method

Active Comparator

change in p wave from ECG

干预措施: ECG (Device)

结局指标

主要结局

CVC prediction depth using andropulous equation

时间窗: 30 minutes

CVC will be inserted in certain depth according to the calculated depth

次要结局

  • ECG change(30 seconds)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Aida Rosita Tantri

Anesthesiologist Consultant

Indonesia University

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验