MedPath

Improving In-hospital and Post-discharge Patient Education for Mild Traumatic Brain Injury

Not Applicable
Conditions
Concussion, Mild
Traumatic Brain Injury
Registration Number
NCT06595914
Lead Sponsor
Medical College of Wisconsin
Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to develop and validate ways to provide better patient education and clinical management for individuals who go to the emergency department (ED) with concussion or mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI).

Detailed Description

The study will address three aims: (1) identify factors that help and hinder providing in-ED education to patients with mTBI prior to discharge; (2) examine the impact of tailored implementation strategies on ED providers' provision of in-ED patient education; and (3) evaluate the impact of providing patient education in the ED and through a mobile Health (mHealth) tool post-discharge on patient-level outcomes after mTBI.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
5831
Inclusion Criteria

ED clinicians:

• Faculty attending physician, advanced practice professional (APP), resident, fellow, or nurse who practices in an eligible Froedtert & Medical College of Wisconsin (MCW) emergency department

Patients-Survey Cohort:

  • Seen and discharged from a Froedtert & MCW emergency department.
  • Age 18 or older.
  • Has a clinical diagnosis of TBI, as reflected by a relevant International Classification of Disease-10th Edition (ICD-10) code or other evidence (e.g., diagnosis and educational information in the After Visit Summary)
  • Speaks English or Spanish.

Patients-Chart Review Only:

  • Seen and discharged from a Froedtert & MCW emergency department.
  • Age 18 or older.
  • Has a clinical diagnosis of TBI, as reflected by a relevant ICD-10 code or other evidence (e.g., diagnosis and educational information in the After Visit Summary).
Exclusion Criteria

ED clinicians:

• Providers that do not practice in a Froedtert & Medical College of Wisconsin emergency department.

Patients-Survey Cohort.

  • On psychiatric hold.
  • Is not own decision maker (e.g., activated healthcare power of attorney).
  • Indicated Do Not Contact in their research contact preferences.
  • Left the emergency department prematurely (e.g., against medical advice).
  • History of serious health condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, would interfere with engagement in or validity of the survey (e.g., active thought disorder; terminal cancer; dementia).

Patients-Chart Review Only:

• Minors under the age of 18.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
mTBI symptom burdenDay 1 post-ED visit, Day 30 post-ED visit

Patient-rated Rivermead Post Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire total score (range 0-64; higher scores = more severe injury-related symptoms) (Aim 3 outcome).

Change in patient-level penetration-electronic health record (EHR)Pre-intervention baseline period (estimated study onset to 1 year later); post- intervention follow-up period (estimated 18 months from study onset to 1 year later)

Change in the percentage of concussion/mTBI-related encounters for which an mTBI patient handout was documented in the Epic After Visit Summary (Aim 2 outcome)

Change in patient-level penetration-patient reported outcome (PRO)Pre-intervention baseline period (estimated study onset to 1 year later); post- intervention follow-up period (estimated 18 months from study onset to 1 year later)

Change in the percentage of concussion/mTBI-related encounters for which patients reported having received mTBI patient education before ED discharge (Aim 2 outcome)

Self-efficacy to manage mTBI symptomsDay 1 post-ED visit, Day 30 post-ED visit

Patient ratings on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Short Form v1.0 - Self-Efficacy for Managing Symptoms, a 20-point scale based on 4 Likert-type items with 5 response options each (higher scores = more confidence) (Aim 3 outcome).

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Change in percentage of trauma cases resulting in mTBI diagnosisPre-intervention baseline period (estimated study onset to 1 year later); post-intervention follow-up period (estimated 18 months from study onset to 1 year later)

Change in the percentage of ED encounters for a traumatic injury resulting in a diagnosis of concussion or mTBI

Patient-rated mTBI knowledgeDay 30 post-ED visit

Patient-rated mTBI knowledge, measured with a 23-item True/False scale (total score range 0-23; higher scores = greater knowledge). Questions ask about common and uncommon mTBI symptoms and common misconceptions about mTBI signs and recovery.

Patient-rated clinical care satisfaction at Day 1Day 1 post-ED visit

Collected on a 5-point scale with the options Very Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Neither Satisfied Nor Dissatisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, and Very Dissatisfied. The question is "How satisfied are you with the care you received for head injury in the Emergency Department?"

Patient-rated clinical care satisfaction at Day 30Day 30 post-ED visit

Collected on a 5-point scale with the options Very Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Neither Satisfied Nor Dissatisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, and Very Dissatisfied. The question is "How satisfied are you with the care you received for head injury since leaving the emergency department?"

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Medical College of Wisconsin

🇺🇸

Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States

Medical College of Wisconsin
🇺🇸Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States
© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath