Improving point of care ultrasound documentation among emergency medicine residents

Not Applicable

• Registration Number: CTRI/2024/03/063671
• Lead Sponsor: Jawaharlal Institute Of Postgraduate Medical Education And Research

Brief Summary

Not available

Detailed Description

Not available

Study Timeline

• Results First Posted: 1900-01-01
• Last Update Posted: 1 April 2024

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: ot Yet Recruiting
• Sex: Not specified
• Target Recruitment: 0

Inclusion Criteria

All Emergency medicine residents in the residency program at JIPMER.

Exclusion Criteria

Emergency medicine residents who have not completed a point of care ultrasound training.

Missing Reporting Forms or documentation

Study & Design

• Study Type: Observational
• Study Design: Not specified

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
To estimate the change in proportion of ultrasound examinations done by emergency residents that has 80% compliance with the standard reporting guidelines for point of care ultrasound in emergency departmentTimepoint: 15 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
To determine the impact of the implementation of the ACEP standard reporting guidelines on credentialing or attaining expected competencies in using POCUS for clinical decision-makingTimepoint: 6 months;To estimate the impact of the implementation of the ACEP standard reporting guidelines on image archiving and the retrieval of point of care ultrasound images in the emergency departmentTimepoint: 9 months;To evaluate the emergency medicine residents confidence and proficiency in using the ACEP standard reporting guidelines for point of care ultrasoundTimepoint: 12 months;To identify the factors that facilitate or hinder the adoption and implementation of the standard reporting guidelines for point of care ultrasound documentation among emergency medicine residentsTimepoint: 3 months