A STUDY TO COMPARE ACTION OF CHLOROPROCAINE AND ROPIVACAINE USED TO GIVE SPINAL ANAESTHESIA IN BOTTOM SURGERIES.
Phase 3
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2022/01/039263
- Lead Sponsor
- il
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ot Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
Inclusion Criteria
American Society of anaesthesiologists grade 1 or 2 patients.
Patients Undergoing perianal surgeries under spinal anaesthesia.
Exclusion Criteria
Patients posted for emergency procedures.
Patients with major neurological, cardiac, respiratory, metabolic, renal, hepatic diseases with coagulational abnormalities.
Patients contra indicated for spinal anaesthesia.
Patients with known allergies to the study drugs.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method To compare the efficacy of sensory and motor blockade and the recovery from sensory and motor blockade of chloroprocaine and ropivacaine.Timepoint: To compare the efficacy of sensory and motor blockade and the recovery from sensory and motor blockade of chloroprocaine and ropivacaine intraoperatively and postoperatively for 24hours
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method To compare the duration of analgesia And post operative analgesic requirements.Timepoint: Amount of post-operative analgesia and time required for ambulation assessed for 24hours post-operatively.