Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/CTRI/2012/11/003118
CTRI/2012/11/003118
Recruiting
未知

A Prospective Study To Compare The Outcomes After Primary Laparoscopic Exploration Of Common Bile Duct And Laparoscopic Exploration Following Failed Endoscopic Stone Extraction In Patients With Concomitant Gall Stones And Common Bile Duct Stones

AIIMS0 sites80 target enrollmentTBD

Overview

Phase
未知
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Health Condition 1: null- ASA 1/2 pateints with concomitant CBD stones and gall stones
Sponsor
AIIMS
Enrollment
80
Status
Recruiting
Last Updated
4 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

No summary available.

Registry
who.int
Start Date
TBD
End Date
TBD
Last Updated
4 years ago
Study Type
Interventional

Investigators

Sponsor
AIIMS

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • 1\.Patients with both symptomatic gall stones and choledocholithiasis
  • 2\.Patients in whom a prior ERCP had failed to extract a CBD stone
  • Failure of ERCP will be defined as:
  • 1\.Unsuitable anatomy such as gastric outlet obstruction, large periampullary diverticulum
  • 2\.Failure to cannulate the bile duct
  • 3\.Failure to perform adequate sphincterotomy
  • 4\.Failure to extract the stone for various reasons such as large stone, impacted stones and/or multiple stones

Exclusion Criteria

  • 1\.Patients with acute cholecystitis
  • 2\.Patients with acute cholangitis
  • 3\.Patients with obstructive jaundice with serum bilirubin \> 15mg/dl
  • 4\.Patients with post ERCP pancreatitis
  • 5\.Patients who do not give consent for participate in the study
  • 6\.Patients with previous hepatobiliary surgery
  • 7\.Patients with morbid obesity
  • 8\.Patients with uncorrectable coagulopathy
  • 9\.Patients unfit for GA
  • 10\.Patients with significant comorbid conditions

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Not specified

Similar Trials