REvascularization Versus Optimal Medical Therapy on Left Ventricular ISchemia Reduction: Exploring the Associations Between Ischemia, Functional Outcome and Collaterals in the Treatment of Chronic Total Occlusion Patients
Overview
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Chronic Total Occlusion of Coronary Artery
- Sponsor
- Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)
- Enrollment
- 82
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- Ischemia
- Status
- Recruiting
- Last Updated
- 2 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
Rationale: Randomized trials could not yet establish favourable outcomes of CTO PCI on hard endpoints such as ejection fraction or mortality, when compared to optimal medical therapy. However, patients after CTO PCI appeared to be more frequently free of angina complaints, but the aetiology behind this is not fully understood. The investigators hypothesize that PCI of the CTO in patients preselected with an ischemic threshold (>12.5%) on cardiac imaging leads to a reduction of the ischemic burden and therefore an increased benefit on functional outcomes.
Objective: Primary objective is to determine whether PCI of the CTO will yield a higher reduction of ischemia assessed by exercise myocardial perfusion SPECT-CT from baseline to 6-month follow-up compared to a control group. Secondary objectives are 1) to evaluate the effect of PCI of the CTO on improvement in functional status, infarct size and left ventricular function from baseline to follow-up compared to the control group; 2) to study the association between ischemia reduction and functional outcome and left ventricular function; 3) to assess the influence of the collateral flow index on the ischemic burden (reduction), functional status, infarct size and left ventricular (contractile) function (hibernation).
Study design: open multicentre randomized trial
Study population: 82 patients eligible for CTO PCI
Intervention: CTO PCI
Primary endpoint: ischemic burden assessed with exercise myocardial perfusion SPECT-CT from baseline to 6 months follow-up.
Investigators
J.P.S Henriques
Principal Investigator, Head of Catheterization Laboratory
Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •A chronic total occlusion is present and target lesion. A CTO is required to meet the following characteristics:
- •A 100% luminal narrowing of the coronary artery without antegrade flow, i.e. Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction flow grade 0 or 1;
- •Older than 3 months, established with previous PCI or with angiographic characteristics;
- •Amenable to percutaneous revascularization.
- •Patient has a clinical indication to perform CTO PCI.
- •A SPECT is performed at baseline to assess ischemia and a cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) scan to assess viability, as part of routine patient care. Patients are deemed eligible for the randomized trial when they meet the ischemic threshold in the CTO territory.
- •The ischemic threshold is defined as:
- •\>12.5% of ischemia;
- •With \<50% transmural extent of infarction.
- •Subject agrees to undergo follow-up SPECT-CT at 6 months after initial inclusion
Exclusion Criteria
- •Subject is younger than 18 years of age;
- •Persistent or permanent atrial fibrillation;
- •Presence of a non-MRI compatible cardiac device, i.e. pacemaker or implantable cardioverter defibrillator;
- •Body weight \> 250 kg;
- •Unable to exert, i.e. due to physical disability;
- •Any contraindication for SPECT or CMR, i.e. cerebrovascular clips, claustrophobia;
- •Known renal insufficiency (estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate \[eGFR\] \<60 mL/min/1.73m2 or serum creatinine level of \>2.5 mg/dL or subject on dialysis);
- •Hypersensitivity or allergy to contrast with inability to properly pre-hydrate;
- •Presence of a comorbid condition with a life expectancy of less than one year;
- •Participation in another trial;
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Ischemia
Time Frame: 6 months follow-up
Ischemic burden assessed with exercise myocardial perfusion SPECT-CT from baseline to 6 months follow-up.
Secondary Outcomes
- Quality of life assessed with the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ)(6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years, 5 years, 6 years, 7 years, 8 years, 9 years, 10 years)
- The left ventricular ejection fraction assessed with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging(6 months)
- Change in angina status assessed with the Seattle Angina Questionnaire.(6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years, 5 years, 6 years, 7 years, 8 years, 9 years, 10 years)