Efficacy Study of the LARA Wheelchair System for Subacute Stroke Patients

Not Applicable

Completed

Conditions: Cerebrovascular Accident

Interventions: Behavioral: Standard
Device: LARA

Registration Number: NCT02830893

Lead Sponsor: University of California, Irvine

Brief Summary: This study will test the effectiveness of a new lever drive wheelchair, LARA - Lever Actuated Resonance Assistance. LARA facilitates patients in performing a high amount of practice using their moderate to severely impaired upper extremity after stroke.

Investigators will recruit 44 subjects with subacute strokes to participate in the study through the acute rehabilitation unit of the UC Irvine Douglas Hospital. Study participants will be randomized into 2 groups: LARA therapy group or standard therapy group. The LARA therapy group will use LARA to propel themselves to therapy appointments in the unit and to play video games with the affected upper extremity for 30 mins / day. The standard therapy group will use a standard wheelchair to propel themselves using their unaffected upper and lower extremities. They will be asked to perform a matched duration of standard arm exercises for 30 mins/ day. This program of standard arm exercises was developed by an OT at the Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago which consists of graded-difficulty table-supported exercises.

This study will have 3 assessment visits: baseline, 3 weeks after therapy or upon discharge from the acute rehabilitation unit if sooner, and a 3-month follow up.

Detailed Description: Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status: COMPLETED

Sex: All

Target Recruitment: 23

Inclusion Criteria

Age ≥ 18 years at the time of enrollment
Stroke onset 1-4 weeks prior to study enrollment
Arm motor FM score of < 30 (out of 66) at Baseline Visit
Absence of moderate to severe shoulder pain ( Score <3 on the 10 point visual analog pain scale)
Any deficit in vision, alertness, language, attention, or other cognitive functions that interfere with playing the LARA games

Exclusion Criteria

Age >80 years at the time of enrollment
Severe tone in the affected upper extremities (Score ≥ 4 on the Modified Ashworth Spasticity Scale)
Severe language problem that would prevent participants from properly understanding instructions
Severe reduced level of consciousness
Severe aphasia (score of 3 on the NIH stroke scale (question 9))
Severe loss of sensation in stroke-affected upper extremities (Score < 1 on the Nottingham sensory assessment)
Currently pregnant
Difficulty in understanding or complying with the instructions given by the experimenter
Inability to perform the experimental task that will be studied

Study & Design

Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL

Study Design: PARALLEL

Arm && Interventions

Group	Intervention	Description
The Standard Therapy	Standard	The control arm of this study will use a standard wheelchair while study participants are staying at the acute rehabilitation unit of UC Irvine Douglas Hospital. Study participants will have no exposure to LARA and they will use a standard wheelchair. They will use their unaffected upper and lower extremities to propel themselves in the unit.
The LARA Therapy	LARA	The LARA arm of this study will use the LARA system while study participants are staying at the acute rehabilitation unit of UC Irvine Douglas Hospital. LARA is a system that facilitates patients to perform high amounts of arm movement with the affected upper extremity. Study participants are able to actively propel themselves in the unit.

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Fugl-Meyer (FM) Motor Assessment of the Upper Extremity	Baseline, Post-intervention evaluation at 3 weeks, and 3-month evaluation after the end of intervention	We measure the change of the Fugl-Meyer Motor Assessment scores from the baseline evaluation to the 3-month follow up evaluation after the end of intervention. Fugl-Meyer is a 66-point scale measuring the movement pattern of the upper extremities. For the study, we analyze the total score only. The higher scores indicate a better outcome.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Timed 10-meter Walk	Baseline, Post-intervention evaluation at 3 weeks, and 3-months after the end of intervention	We measure the time one takes to complete a 10-meter walk at baseline evaluation, the post-intervention evaluation, and the 3-month follow up evaluation. Participants are instructed to walk at a distance of 10-meter over a level surface with 2 meters for acceleration and 2 meters for deceleration. Participants are instructed to walk at their comfortable or normal speed over the entire distance. Participants are timed once the first foot passes the acceleration path; the time is stopped once the first foot enters the deceleration path. The lower scores indicate a better outcome.
Modified Ashworth Spasticity Scale	Baseline, Post-intervention evaluation at 3 weeks, and 3-months after the end of intervention	We measure the spasticity of the upper extremity at baseline, post-intervention, and at the 3-month follow up evaluation. Spasticity is described as the resistance to passive movement. Participants are asked to relax and evaluators assess muscle resistance to passive movement at one joint at a time: Shoulder, Elbow, Wrist, and Fingers. The evaluator will then grade the resistance on a 6-point scale for each joint. Higher scores indicate more rigid movement or more muscle tone resistance. The minimum score is zero and the maximum score is 4. For this study, we combine all subscores from each joint to compute a total spasticity score.
Box and Blocks Test	Baseline, Post-intervention evaluation at 3 weeks, and 3-months after the end of intervention	We measured the Box and Blocks Test scores at baseline evaluation, the post-intervention, and at the 3-month follow up evaluation. Participants are instructed to move as many blocks as possible, one at a time, from one compartment in a box to a second compartment over a divider for a period of 60 seconds; each block that is moved is counted, and multiple blocks moved at the same time are counted are counted as a single block. The higher scores indicate a better outcome.