Bipolar Hemostatic Forceps Versus Standard Therapy in Acute Non-variceal Upper GI Bleeding
- Conditions
- Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage
- Interventions
- Procedure: Endoscopic therapy with hemoclip +/- injection of epinephrine solutionProcedure: Hemostatic therapy
- Registration Number
- NCT05353062
- Lead Sponsor
- Theresienkrankenhaus und St. Hedwig-Klinik GmbH
- Brief Summary
Bipolar hemostatic forceps will be tested against standard therapy in active, non-variceal, upper gastrointestinal bleeding by a prospective, randomized trial
- Detailed Description
Patients with active, non-variceal, upper gastrointestinal bleeding usually need an urgent endoscopic treatment. The standard therapy by application of an hemoclip and/or injection of an epinephrine solution is not always successful. Bipolar hemostatic forceps is already being used successfully for the treatment of gastrointestinal bleeding in endoscopic submucosal dissection. Its use in primary endoscopic treatment of non-variceal, upper gastrointestinal bleeding has not been shown yet in a randomized prospective study. Patients with active, non-variceal, upper gastrointestinal bleeding (esophagus or stomach or duodenum) of any cause are randomized (1:1) in standard therapy by combination therapy using an hemoclip and/or injection of an epinephrine solution or experimental therapy by application of the bipolar hemostatic forceps. Cross over-treatment should be tried first in case of failed initial treatment. Rescue treatment by other methods such as application of an Over the Scope Clip (OTSC), angiographic embolization or surgery will be allowed next. All patients receive an additional standard therapy by proton pump inhibitors (PPI). Hypothesis: Endoscopic therapy by application of the bipolar hemostatic forceps is superior to standard therapy regarding technical success and rebleeding rate.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 80
- Active, nonvariceal, upper gastrointestinal bleeding
- Severe coagulopathy unresponsive to blood products transfusions: platelets <20,000; international normalized ratio >3.0; partial thromboplastin time >2 normal
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- SINGLE_GROUP
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Standard therapy Endoscopic therapy with hemoclip +/- injection of epinephrine solution Endoscopic therapy with hemoclip +/- injection of epinephrine solution Bipolar hemostatic forceps Hemostatic therapy Endoscopic therapy with bipolar hemostatic forceps
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Rebleeding 30 days Number of participants without recurrent endoscopically visible gastrointestinal bleeding in esophagogastroduodonoscopy
Successful primary hemostasis 15 minutes Number of participants without further endoscopically visible gastrointestinal bleeding in esophagogastroduodonoscopy
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Reinterventions 30 days Number of endoscopic reinterventions for gastrointestinal bleeding
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Helios Kliniken Schwerin
🇩🇪Schwerin, Germany